Walid Shoebat Video Listing

Walid Shoebat Video Listing

Famous interview of Walid Shoebat on BBC!


Walid Shoebat Gives A 25 Minutes Speech That Sums It All Up! (From 2008)

Bible Prophecy and the Coming Muslim Antichrist by Walid Shoebat

Why Islam Is Antichrist Part 1 Former Muslim Walid Shoebat


Exclusive! Walid Shoebat on ISIS slaughtering Christians in Mosul – 8-12-14


Refutation of Western Antichrist: Walid Shoebat End Times Alert (November 2010) [Very complete teaching on Islam and Antichrist]

YES OBAMA IS A TERRORIST- Walid Shoebat Interview on Savage Nation Radio


God’s War on Terror and the Islamic Anti-Christ Walid Shoebat Ex PLO Terrorist


Dave hunt cannot refute Walid Shoebat on prophecy


Walid Shoebat Bible Prophecy and the Islamic Antichrist


Islamic Agenda In The U S by Walid Shoebat (Haggman and Haggman Report)


The Empire Of The Antichrist Is Very Near

by on April 1, 2014 in General

By Walid Shoebat

The empire of the Antichrist is very near, and it will be Turkey.

Before we examine the issue of Turkey, we must first examine the monumental problems in much of what circulates the prophecy arena in the West.

Perhaps the major problem with modern Bible Prophecy Analysts in the U.S. is that they are mostly ahistorical who also invest in a crowd that is also ahistorical.

Another problem is that the Bible is mostly focused on the Middle East and most Western Prophecy writers have a scant understanding of the Middle East demography, sectarian rifts and religious aspirations in the region. It is not only the Prophecy analysts that always fall into this weakness, but also political and government analysts who are always screwing up more than they resolve matters.


If in doubt, just look at the results of U.S. policies in the region; Syria, Iraq, Libya and Egypt as a result of U.S. policies are all in a big mess and there is no end in the horizon for the U.S. to be able to repair the damage. While many blame Obama, I can also give several examples in which Carter messed up during the Iranian Revolution, Regan messed up in Afghanistan (he gave stingers to the Mujahideen who later became the Taliban), and good old Bush messed up Iraq. America is a young lion with short history and a very short memory span.

Ottoman soldiers in WW1

The other problem is that U.S. based Prophecy analysts always base their writings on novels that are littered with finding similarities between some political figure then compares him to Antichrist, yet they do this without examining the differences between what the Bible says about Antichrist and that specific figure’s origin and religious affiliations. If in doubt, name one Prophecy analyst in the West that named a political or religious figure as suspect to being Antichrist or Gog and then turned out right? Decades of suspects from Hitler, Kissinger to Gorbachev and lately Putin and other countless Popes before were named Gog and Antichrist and they were all dead wrong. The only thing the heaped for the Kingdom is a list of slanders against these individuals; calling someone the Antichrist when they are not is not a simple sin one can brush under the table.

A map reflecting the common view of American prophecy, identifying Russia as Magog, and Western Europe as Gog

Then they suspected the European Union and when that didn’t fit, they later named the G7/G8 as the seven heads of revelation 17. Last week, the unlucky candidate was Putin as Gog and his invasion of Crimea set off some prophetic alarms by so many unlearned alarmists.

The prudent in the western Church will begin to realize that the Antichrist system will not be the European Union, G7/G8, Illuminates, the Bilderbergs, as modern prophecy buffs have stated for years, but an Islamic Union led by Turkey.


Why am I so confident? It is because Turkey (aka Yavan, Lydia, Meshech, Tubal, Gomer and Pergamum) is in several major prophetic key references in the Bible.

How do we know who is and who is not learned? It’s simple, the unlearned will always say something like this: “scholars have suggested Germany as the modern day equivalent of Beth-togarmah”.

What “scholars”? They never usually provide any except to refer to another Prophecy analyst like them who are neither scholars nor historians. While there is nothing wrong by not being a scholar or a historian, what is wrong is that these never refer to real scholars at all. For several examples of what I mean, read here.

Then you have what is perhaps the greatest problem: verse isolation. When was the last time you studied a U.S. Prophecy analyst who cross referenced Antichrist’s Battle of Armageddon to Zechariah 9:13 when the Lord declared:

I will rouse your sons, O Zion, against your sons, O Yavan.

But who is Yavan? Is it Japan because it sounds the same? and is just as Meshech sounds like Moscow and Tubal sounds like Tobolsk? Is Gomer Germany?

And here lays the crux of all this; no one will find a single historian who would make such outlandish claims as this, yet many do and so many follow them.

Javan is in Anatolia. In this passage, Israel, including their Messiah, is seen fighting against Ionia (Yavan), not the European Union or the U.S or Russia or the G7/G8 …

Erdoğan of Turkey is so set on Israel that books can be written on this subject alone, but instead, they write about some Western fictional figure in Left Behind, and the simpletons gobble up fairy tales.

In several Bibles, this name Yavan is translated as “Greece” but Ionia/Yavan was simply a province that was located on the western coast of modern Turkey. This is crucial because the clear context of this battle is the return of Christ: “Then Jehovah will appear over them” and fight on their behalf. So in the End-Times, at the time when Jesus returns, the Jews (Zion) will be engaged in a war with Turkey (Yavan).

A map that accurately depicts Javan's location in Turkey.

As we predicted several years ago, Egypt fell to the Muslim Brotherhood. We stated that Egypt would end up in civil war between secularists and Muslim Brotherhood with the Christians of Egypt caught in the middle.

The Bible speaks of Egypt and not the Bilderbergs, Illuminates or Russians. The destiny of Egypt is spelled out in Isaiah 19.

Egypt—in the coming years—will be weakened to the point that the Turks (Iron) will take over the weakened clay nations of Egypt, Tunisia and Libya (Daniel 11:42). These just opted for the fad of Sharia over western secularism exactly as we stated long ago. Keep in mind, the Muslim Brotherhood won by democratic elections just as Hamas won in the Palestinian arena and just as the AKP Islamist party won in Turkey through democracy.

Demon possessed Muslim in Egypt

Anyone care to tell me that Islam is dead or has been already defeated? Yesterday it gained the most major boost in recent history when the Turkish AKP Islamist Party won in the mayoral elections.

Things are also tightening for Saudi Arabia, the mother harlot of Wahhabism.

The Babylon of the end-times is not Iraq or Rome as many said.

They failed to examine Scripture closely and isolated verses from their own pre-conceived context. The Bible in end-time prophecy never even mentions ancient cities of Babylon; in every verse in the Bible where a region or city within this predicted Babylon is mentioned, that region or city is in Arabia, not Iraq (Isaiah 21, Jeremiah 49). It is Kedar, Dumah and Arabia; there is no mention of Babel, Sumer, Accad, Erech, Calneh, New York City, Rome … in any of these verses.


Saudi Arabia is soon to be gobbled up by Iran who is building a nuclear bomb. We said for years that neither Israel nor the U.S. would attack Iran. We were right and all the analysts were wrong. And while U.S. prophecy analysts years ago predicted the revival of Iraq’s Babylon by Saddam, their predictions and books are in the garbage bin of history.


Arabia is the mouthpiece (mouth of a lion), which Islam emanates from. It is the Harlot from the desert Island (Revelation 17:3) that sits on many waters, the “desert of the sea” (Isaiah 21) which John saw. It is the desert where Christ warned us about (Mathhew 24:22, Galatians 4:25) and is referred to as “Babylon is fallen is fallen” in Isaiah 21.

We live in an era with Christians who love God, yet they do not love knowledge and are destroyed for the lack of it.

The Antichrist is said to rule from Pergamum (Revelation 2:12-13), which Christ proclaimed would be the future seat of Satan. This is on the sides of the northern lands (Asia Minor / Turkey). He never proclaimed the Altar of Pergamum that sits in some museum in Germany as the seat of Antichrist. There is no “altar” in the verse.


Probably the most major problem with U.S. Prophecy analysts is that they always examine Prophecy from the Books of Daniel and Revelation, which are mostly allegoric, without adhering to the literal references of nations in other parts of the Bible. When we examine the nations that are named in the Bible, they are all Islamic today.

We have been belaboring this for two decades to the deaf ears of America. Now we see Turkey succeeding as we stated for two decades, and exactly as we stated it as a revival of the Ottoman Empire.

Erdoğan’s rise to power, being called Sultan and Caliph is very interesting. When the AKP Islamist party won power in the 2002 elections, its newfound position of influence brought together an alliance of two Islamic movements 1) the Naqshbandi- and 2) The Gülenists, a movement of the preacher Fethullah Gülen who is established from Pennsylvania in the U.S.

To see how far back Erdogan was involved in the Naqshabandi movement watch this wakeup call by Naqshabandi Sufist Imam giving a speech in the presence of Erdogan and Erbakan and hear what he said about taking over the world:

Like Egypt, the big factor in maintaining a government is the military. In Turkey, the military always moved in whenever an Islamist government came to power and closed shop. In the case of Turkey, both groups (Naqshabandi and Gülenists) feared that the military — and subsequently the judiciary — were poised to close them down leading them to work jointly to reduce the military through judicial processes, particularly with the Ergenekon and Sledgehammer plot investigations.

Erdoğan will continue to change set laws.

Erdogan caused deceit to prosper (Daniel 8:25). The unity between the Gülenists and the Naqshabandis was instrumental in helping the AKP survive the closure case in the Constitutional Court in 2008. Through substantial violations of due process including the outright fabrication of evidence the AKP neutralized forces that opposed it. By this Erdoğan opened the way for the AKP to schedule and win the September 2010 referendum to amend the 1982 constitution, which transferred control of the judiciary to the ruling Islamic conservative coalition.

But the tactical alliance between the AKP and the Gülen movement began to fade once their common enemies had been neutralized which many thought will be the downfall of Erdoğan’s AKP party. Yet the analysts were wrong, the rift only made a little dent, the Gulenists were less politically active and the AKP won the mayoral elections on March 31, 2014.

Erdogan Revived A Wounded Empire that received a deadly wound. This is no small issue. The Ottoman Empire was called the dead man of Europe and now it rose from the dead. I spoke on this and monitored it for two decades and today we see neo-Ottomanism, which is the process of healing this wound. Today no analyst denies this.

To understand how the AKP came to power, we need some history. The AKP leadership is a product of the political tradition of the Milli Görüs movement, founded decades ago by Necmettin Erbakan who wanted to revive the Ottoman Empire. His group consisted of members and followers of the Iskender Pasa wing of the Khaledi branch of the Naqshbandi order, which traces its lineage to Caliph Abu Bakr, Prophet Muhammad’s father in law and first Caliph of Islam rather than Ali.

The Gülen movement was more pro-Turkish nationalism, and many of its members had a past in the ülkücü or “idealist” nationalist organizations. To revive a purely Islamic Empire demands less nationalism and more universalism. Gülen and Erdoğan clashed over several issues’ like the Gaza Flotilla and Iran. Gülen was against the Flotilla and Erdoğan supported it. But the major issue was Iran.

Turkey uniting with Iran brings us to Ezekiel 38’s Gog who unites with Persia (Iran). For Putin to be Gog, Russia must control Turkey. The ahistoricals do not understand that Russia and Turkey are two rivals who have warred against each other from time immemorial. For anyone who still doubts us that Putin can never be Gog, please read our 6 part series [here]. The Gülen movement’s media outlets have long been scathing in their rhetoric against the Iranian theocratic regime, in a way that has often generated disbelief among traditional Islamists in the AKP. Gülenists even worked to undermine AKP foreign minister Ahmet Davutoglu’s efforts to improve ties with Iran.

Turkey wants unity with Iran and the Gülenist simply did not fit in Erdoğan’s structure; they also opposed the AKP’s peace talks with Kurdish Abdullah Öcalan, imprisoned leader of the PKK (Partiya Karkerên Kurdistan–Kurdistan Workers’ Party). When Erdoğan’s intelligence chief Hakan Fidan and two of his predecessors were brought in for questioning over their role in negotiations with the PKK by Gülenist police, Erdoğan became paranoid and thought he was next. Gülen then began to attack Erdoğan’s corruption with kickbacks from major companies and the rift was clear, Erdoğan turned on Gülen.

Erdoğan is just as paranoid as Stalin. In Erdoğan’s conspiratorial mindset, the Gülen movement was complicit in planning protests at the behest of pro-Zionist global forces who he believes were plotting his downfall.

Now Erdoğan intends to turn Turkey into the Presidential Republic with a constitutional amendment to become the first President elected directly by the people. Erdoğan is currently overseeing efforts to rewrite the constitution and convert Turkey to a presidential system in which the president, rather than the prime minister, will hold sway. This would give Erdoğan perhaps two more terms of five or seven years each depending on how they amend the constitution.

Turkey’s Sufist brand of Islam will be welcomed over Wahhabism which links to Saudi Arabia and the Gulf. With the Muslim Brotherhood more allied with the Turkish Ottoman roots, Turkey can advance into Egypt as Daniel predicted. With a war on Wahhabism, this next brand of Islam will be the most deceptive of its kind.

Finally, in Islam, there is what is called Bai’at (allegiance). Whomever will lead this new movement, and in order to win the hearts of the Muslim world, must present himself as Caliph and a Caliph by Islamic law must be given allegiance (Bai’at) by all Muslims. This Bai’at (allegiance) will be for seven years in which all Muslims must have the mark of their faith on their forehead or on their right arm.

Marks of Allegiance to Islam in Turkey in which we can see clearly "Allah" on the right arm.

Will this happen in the next seven year term or the other? Will Erdogan lead this? Is Erdogan the Antichrist? To answer these questions with a definite “yes” is still speculative, so we must wait.

For more, see God’s War on Terror

Islam the disease

Islam the disease.

via Islam the disease.

A Practical Way of Interpreting Prophecy- Walid Shoebat

by Walid Shoebat

Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most times he will pick himself up and carry on. – Winston Churchill


“For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept, line upon line, line upon line, here a little, there a little.” (Isaiah 28:10).

We must be like detectives, always on the look-out for clues which could be hidden anywhere in the Word of God, «here a little, there a little».

“The whole vision has become to you like the words of a book that is sealed, which men deliver to one who is literate, saying, «Read this, please»; and he says, «I cannot, for it is sealed.»” (Isaiah 29:11)

But then:

“The Lord answered me and said: «Write the vision and make it plain on tablets, that he may run who reads it.»” (Habakkuk 2:2).

The Word of God states positively that prophecy may well and truly be understood!

All we need is to put into practice the counsels the Bible gives us, in order to study prophecy in an effective way.

“[The Jews from Berea] were more fair-minded than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness, and searched the Scriptures daily to find out whether these things were so.” (Acts 17:11).

“Knowing this first, that no prophecy of Scripture is of any private interpretation.” (2 Peter 1:20)

Many who claim to have the gift of interpreting prophecy, yet have been proven wrong over and over again.


From Ibn Khaldun’s al-Muqqadima:

“… There will come forth a man from my nation who will talk according to my Sunnah. God will send upon him rain from heaven, and the earth will sprout forth for him its blessing. The earth will be filled through him with equity and justice, as it his been filled with injustice and crime. He will direct the affairs of this nation for seven years, and he will settle in Jerusalem.”

The Mahdi of Islam has many elements in his description to set them up for the greatest deceiver ever.

Tighten your seat belt, you are about to be taken on a long interpretation, but please read it and study it slowly. At first it will sound absurd, but later on, it will click, and your thinking will never be the same.

The question has always been, is anti-Christ a Jew, an Arab, or a European?

The answer for the above is “None of the above.”

Most likely he will be from Southern Russia, Bosnia, Chechen, Uzbek, Kazakhstan, Girgestan … which are all majority Muslim.


The answer is very simple, it is as obvious as apple pie, yet everyone seems to miss it. Ezekiel 38’s “Gog” whom many seem to confuse as a “separate war before Armageddon” or “a war after the millennium”. Just as majority of Bible believers before Christ missed Christ in Isaiah 53, when it was so obvious, Christians miss anti-Christ in Ezekiel 38, and it too is very obvious.

Gog of Ezekiel, is the same Gog of Revelation unleashed at the world TWICE.

The Bible gives the opposing names to the true God, and attributes them to the Antichrist. Christ is called “The Truth”, while Antichrist is called “The lie”. Christ is called the “Holy One”, while Antichrist is called “The lawless one”. Christ is called “The Son of God”, while Antichrist is called “The Son of Perdition”. Christ is called “The Mystery of Godliness”, while Antichrist is called “The Mystery of Iniquity”.

God allows Satan to continue although He could destroy him. The Bible teaches that Jesus Christ will finally destroy Satan’s Son of Perdition (The Antichrist) “by the brightness of His coming”. Satan’s main tactic to destroy God’s plan is to counterfeit the biblical prophecies and present himself as the Messiah. He doesn’t necessarily have to have the same name, but carry the same attributes. God gave many warnings in the Bible concerning Satan and his works:

“Then the king shall do according to his own will: he shall exalt and magnify himself above every god, shall speak blasphemies against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the wrath has been accomplished; for what has been determined shall be done” (Daniel 11:36). The Antichrist’s will is his father’s will (The Father of lies or the Devil), while Christ’s will is His Father’s will (The God of Truth). The mystery of God’s nature is presented in the Bible as One God (Father, Son, Holy Spirit): “Behold O Israel, the Lord your God is One”. The unity of God is supported in both the Old Testament as well as in the New Testament.

So Satan, “the proud one”, “the devil”, “Anti-Christ”, “Gog”, and since he will be loosed after the 1000 years he is then STILL called “Gog” and “Satan”. Anti-Christ is simply the “devil incarnate”, “Satan in the flesh” sort of speak.

The fact that “Gog” appears in the tribulation and after the millennium is a dead give away on whom he is. What seems a contradiction between Ezekiel and Revelation is in reality not. The Bible is 100% accurate, God was not mistaken it is we who are confused.


This Ezekiel 38 & 39 is indeed when Christ will fight Israel’s enemies with Gog their leader and will be here in the flesh.

Now, look carefully at Ezekiel 38:19, the earthquake is the greatest in history and matches Zechariah 14:4. This earthquake is definitely the mark of His presence on earth at the moment of His touch down. In Zechariah we have no doubt that it is His touch down. Zech 14:3 “the Lord will go forth and fight …”, verse 4 “His feet will stand …”.

Whose feet? There is no escape of it “The Lord’s feet” (verse 3). When did the Lord have feet?

This earthquake in Ezekiel 38:19 is so awesome “fish of the sea, birds of heavens, beasts of the field, ALL the creeping things, ALL the men on the face of the earth will shake at My presence”.

WHOSE PRESENCE???? Major verse my friend. This “presence” can be proven further to make no doubt that Ezekiel 38 & 39 is the showdown between Christ and Anti-Christ (Gog).

In Ezekiel 39:22 “Israel will know that I AM the Lord their God from that day onward.”

So it’s Israel’s redemption. To make this conclusive, look at Ezekiel 39:7 “the nations will know that I am the Lord, the Holy One in ISRAEL”. Why is the Holy one “in” Israel since the rest of Scripture says “Holy one of Israel”? Again, God will be here on earth, in Israel, and in person. Can there be any doubt?

Also, the birds that eat the armies are mentioned both in Revelation and Ezekiel 38 and 39:

Rev 19:17 “And I saw an angel standing in the sun; and he cried with a loud voice, saying to all the fowls that fly in the midst of heaven, Come and gather yourselves together unto the supper of the great God; 18 That ye may eat the flesh of kings, and the flesh of captains, and the flesh of mighty men, and the flesh of horses, and of them that sit on them, and the flesh of all [men, both] free and bond, both small and great.”

Ezek 39:4 “Thou shall fall upon the mountains of Israel, thou, and all thy bands, and the people that [is] with thee: I will give thee unto the ravenous birds of every sort, and [to] the beasts of the field to be devoured.”

So we have now more confirmation that Ezekiel 38/39 is the Armageddon of Revelation.

And there is more, Ezekiel 38:17 “Are you not the one of whom I have spoken in former days, by … the prophets of Israel.”. When was this “Gog” predicted by the prophets? Which prophets?

We are unable to find any use of “Gog” in the prophets prior to Ezekiel or after, but if Gog is the anti-Christ, there is little problem finding him mentioned previous to Ezekiel: e.g. in Isaiah, Jeremiah, Zechariah, Joel and David, as well as later in the New Testament: Revelation, Letters to the Thessalonians, Jude, the Gospel according to Matthew …

The Anti-Christ was spoken of by all of them but with different nick names: “Gog”, “The Assyrian”, “The Anti-Christ”, “Son of Perdition”, “Lawless one”, “Lucifer”.

In the Bible, we must always pay attention to combinations.



First we have to identify Ezekiel 38’s “far north”. Jeremiah predicted a great exodus of Jews from “The land of the North”. In Jeremiah 16:14-15 he writes, “‘The days are coming,’ declares the Lord, ‘when people will no longer say, “As surely as the Lord lives, Who brought the Israelites up out of Egypt …”, but they will say, “As surely as the Lord lives, Who brought the Israelites up out of the Land of the North, and out of all the other countries where He had banished them.” For I will restore them to the Land I gave their forefathers.’”.

Zechariah 2:5-7 …And the Angel said, “Come! Come! Flee from the land of the north”.

The greatest exodus of Jews in history was from Russia, so we know that the “North country”, the “Land of the North” is Russia. In this case then the “King of the North” is very likely Russia as well since the problem would be as to how could Anti-Christ be from the land of the North (Ezekiel 38:6) and then in Daniel 11:40-45 “And at the time of the end shall the king of the south push at him (Antichrist): and the king of the north (Russia) shall come against him (Anti-Christ) like a whirlwind”?

If Anti-Christ is from the North, then who is the King of the North? And how could the King of the North come against Anti-Christ if Anti-Christ is from the North?

Answer is simple – in Ezekiel Anti-Christ and Magog comes from the “remote parts of the north” (Ezekiel 38:6) and NOT from the Land of the North.

The leader of Russia is the King of the North, and Southern Russia (Muslim Magog-Anti-Christ) is south of Russia and far north of Israel. So when the Anti-Christ is attacked by the “King of the North” he is south of him. This (Southern Russia) is generally Muslim. This will fit very well if the King of the north “leader of Russia” comes against him and his territory south of Russia, yet still in the remote parts of the north.

Russia split, we have today the Commonwealth of the Independent States (C.I.S) which are mostly Islamic and ethnically not related to the Slavic Russians:

Togarmah are the Turkic peoples, Uzbekistan in Southern Russia for example are Turkic. The Macmillan Bible Atlas, Oxford Bible Atlas, The Moody Atlas of Bible Lands, and others, locate Magog, Meshech, Tubal, Gomer and Beth Togarmah in Asia Minor, not Russia. This region, called Anatolia, Asia Minor or now Turkey, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Girgestan … was the heart of the vast Islamic Ottoman Empire for many centuries. Hesiod, “the father of Greek didactic poetry” identified Magog with the Scythians and southern Russia in the 7th century B.C. Hesiod was a contemporary of Ezekiel. Flavius Josephus records that the Magogians were called “Scythians” by the Greeks. Philo, in the 1st century, identifies Magog with southern Russia.

Gomer is the founder of the Cimmerians who settled originally on the shores of the Caspian Sea. The Assyrians referred to them as the Gimirraya. Esarhaddon (681-668 BC) records his defeat of the Gimirrai; whilst King Ashurbanipal tells us in his records of the Cimmerian invasion of Lydia in the days of the Lydian king Gugu (Gygez) around the year 660 BC. This is the name perhaps preserved in Scripture as Gog (Ezek. 38:2). Herodotus gave us a more detailed account of the Kimmeri. In IV.11 he states the following:

“… The wandering Scythians once dwelt in Asia, and there warred with the Massagetae, but with ill success; they therefore quitted their homes, crossed the Araxes, and entered the land of Kimmeria. For the land which is now inhabited by the Scyths was formerly the country of the Kimmerians.” (Herodotus IV.11)

Magog is the region of Gog, the second of the “sons” of Japheth, Ge 10:2, 1Ch 1:5. In Ezekiel 38:2 and 39:6 it is the name of a nation, probably some Scythian or Tartar tribe descended from Japheth. They are described as skilled horsemen, and expert in the use of the bow. The Latin father Jerome says that this word denotes “Scythian nations, fierce and innumerable, who live beyond the Caucasus and the Lake Maeotis, and near the Caspian Sea, and spread out even onward to India.” Perhaps the name “represents the Assyrian Mat Gugi, or ‘country of Gugu,’ the Gyges of the Greeks” (Sayce’s Races, etc.).

The Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge, citing ancient Assyrian writings, places the location of Magog in the land mass between ancient Armenia and Media – in short, the Republics south of Russia and north of Israel, comprised of Azerbajian, Afghanistan, Turkestan, Chechnya, Turkey, Iran and Dagestan. Significantly, all of them are Muslim nations.

The Russians of the far north (Moscow) are unrelated to the southern parts of the today’s C.I.S which are mostly Turkic. In reality the Russians of today are Scandinavians (The Vikings in History. Totowa, NJ: Barnes & Noble Books, 1994). The Vikings’ ventures into Eastern Europe were to a great extent trade related. They established trade routes along the Great Russian rivers, such as Volga and Dnieper, and, since some of the major Russian cities were located on those rivers, they came into the direct contact with the Slavs living there. Despite the controversy on the question of the Russian origins, the sources seem to point out “that Russia had its origin in the Rus who were Scandinavians” (Logan, p. 186). Rurik settled in Novgorod and the other two (Sineus and Truvor) settled in Beloozero and Izborsk (Roesdahl, p. 279). It is apparent that the Kievan dynasty was of a Viking origin. Oleg (Helgi), Igor (Inguar) and his wife Olga (Helga) were of Scandinavian descent. “Igor and Olga’s son Sviatoslav (957-73) was the first ruler to have a Slav name. In 998 AD his son Vladimir adopted Orthodox Christianity … In the reign of his son Yaroslav the Wise (1014-54) the connection with Scandinavia was sealed by royal marriages” (Roesdahl, p. 279).

In the 7th century B.C., nomadic Scythians migrated north into fertile Russian territories. Herodotus the Greek, who visited southern Russia in the 5th century B.C., observed that “Some tribes cultivated the land; the builders of the Parthenon would have gone hungry without Russian wheat; but the ruling element remained nomads, living in tents, yet not altogether eschewing the arts of civilization.” These people also began trading furs and honey with Constantinople; eventually, the merchants acted as middlemen between other settlements in the far north (inhabited by Finnish tribes) and the Roman Empire. As these early Slavic people began to cultivate the land, villages and towns sprang up, protected by wooden citadels, or kremlins, cut from the abundant forest timber. The inhabitants gradually occupied an area from St. Petersburg to Kiev and spoke a language (originating from Greek) quite similar to modern Russian.

The numerous tribes were united in the 8th and 9th centuries, when the Scandinavians, Vikings known as Varangians, migrated south and began establishing trade settlements with the Slavs, along with their own strongholds. Many of these settlements were situated along the Neva River and Lake Ladoga. When the Norseman Rurik defeated the strongest Slavic settlement, Novgorod, in A.D. 862, the Varangians became the rulers of northern Russia. In the south, the Slavic Prince Kii had formed the Kievan territory. In 880, Rurik’s successor, Oleg, conquered the Slavic-ruled Kiev and made the city his capital two years later. With the two areas united, the State of Rus (its name derived from the Viking word ruotsi, meaning “oarsman”) became one of the largest kingdoms in the world.

In fact the Bible even gives the names of the peoples who will contribute in destroying the Islamic confederacy – MENE, ARARAT, ASHKENAZ (Jeremiah 51:27-28).

Armenia is MENE and ARARAT, while Ashkenaz are the Europeans, and Russians.

One could ask as how did we conclude that “MENE” and “ARARAT” are Armenia?

Take for example the prominent city of Van, on the eastern lakeshore of beautiful, scenic and sacred Lake Van in the heart of Armenia, was the capital of the exalted and powerful Araratian Kingdom. (See http://www.armenianhighland.com/van/chronicle240.html)

The land or the kingdom of Ararat (fl. c.9th-7th cent. B.C.), called in Assyrian Urartu, was situated between the river Araks and the lakes Van and Rezaiyeh. It included all the land later called Armenia. (Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, sixth edition).

This is not to confuse “Mount Ararat” (in Turkey) with the Kingdom of Ararat (Armenia).

The Armenians were the only people who cooperated with and aided the Crusaders. When the Crusaders withdrew, Armenia was invaded by the Caliphs of Baghdad, the Sultans of Egypt, the Khans of Tartar, the Shahs of Persia and the Ottoman Turks. For fourteen centuries, the Persians, Romans, Byzantines, Arabs, Mamelukes, Seljuk Turks and the Mongols under Tamerlane, subjugated Greater Armenia and often massacred much of her population.

The Muslim Turks massacred 1.5 million Armenians at once by the order of Tal’at Pasha on September 16th 1915. Finally God’s vengeances will be carried out using the Armenians.

In fact, Russian and Armenian forces have recently had joint military work:

“JOINT RUSSO-ARMENIAN MILITARY EXERCISE UNDER WAY. Russian and Armenian forces began joint tactical exercises on 19 September, Russian and Western media reported. The exercises involve troops, warplanes and armored vehicles and are taking place near the Turkish border in Armavir. The exercises were originally to be held from 23-27 September but were pulled forward to effectively coincide with the Armenian presidential election. Last March the two sides undertook similar exercises for the first time.” – (Lowell Bezanis Open Media Research Institute’s Daily Digest., Part I, Spetember 1996)

Ashkenaz, means “a man as sprinkled: fire as scattered”. He settled first in Armenia, migrating thence to Bithynia, the northern islands of Europe and European west coast: Germany, Scandinavia and Denmark. Further evidence is that Jews from Europe are called “Askenazim”.


In Daniel (11:30) the “Ships of Chittim come against Him” (Anti-Christ).

Balaam foretold (Num. 24:24) “that ships shall come from the coast of Chittim, and afflict Eber.” Daniel prophesied (11:30) that the ships of Chittim would come against the king of the north. It probably denotes Cyprus (Josephus), whose ancient capital was called Kition by the Greeks, and also extendeds to include lands west of Syria (the whole of Greece, as far as Illyricum and Italy which is not Muslim). The name originally designated the Phoenician port of Citium in Cyprus, the term appeared in the Dead Sea Scrolls, and was used of the Romans. So, if it refers to the Romans this would means that the supposed Anti-Christ territory is in fact fighting itself?

In general, Chittim (Kittim) is used of all the islands and various settlements on the sea-coasts which they had occupied, and then of the people who succeeded them when the Phoenician power decayed. Hence it designates generally the islands and coasts of the Mediterranean and the races that inhabit them. The Dodanim who were leaders of a race descended from Javan (Gen. 10:4). They are known in profane history as the Dardani, originally inhabiting Illyricum. They were a semi-Pelasgic race, and in the ethnographical table (Gen. 10) they are grouped with the Chittim (q.v.). In 1 Chr. 1:7, and are called Rodanim. The LXX. and the Samaritan Version also read Rhodii, whence some have concluded that the Rhodians, the inhabitants of the island of Rhodes, are meant.

In Genesis 10:4 the word “Chittim” is applied to the descendants of Javan, and indicates, therefore, the Greek-Latin races, whose territory extended along the coasts of the Mediterranean, and included its islands. By the side of Kittim are mentioned Elisha, Tarshish, and Dodanim ( = Rodanim of 1 Chronicles 1:7), generally explained respectively as Sicily with Southern Italy, Spain and Rhodes. The statement of Josephus, that “all islands, and the greatest part of the sea-coast, are called Chethim ( = Kittim) by the Hebrews,” on the other hand, must be taken as the testimony of one well acquainted with the opinions of the learned world in his time. (New International Standard Bible Encyclopedia).

The Septuagint literally uses the word “Romans” for Daniel 11:30.


Then comes the argument that Anti-Christ comes from the Seleucid Dynasty versus the original land mass of the Selucid Empire. “Kittim” has applied in history to all Seleucid mercenaries since Menelaus was first installed as high priest in Jerusalem with the aid of Antiochus Epiphanes and was accompanied by them. Here in Daniel 11:30 we have the Seleucid’s (Greeks) attacking the Anti-Christ which eliminates the place of Seleucid’s origin and forces the position of the Empire he controlled to be the likely candidate. This is more plausible since no text in Scripture mandates lineage but control. First Maccabees 1:1, written perhaps around 110 BCE, uses Kittim for the land of origin of Alexander, suggesting that Kittim was at that time related to the belligerent Macedonians, the people from whom the Seleucids came.


Argument: “Anti-Christ is Roman as stated in Daniel 9:26 “the prince who is to come”.

Argument: “Anti-Christ is Grecian since Daniel 11 was already fulfilled, Antiochus came and gone”.

Argument: “Daniel 9:26 Anti-Christ comes to destroy the Temple again before the coming of Christ.

In Daniel 9:26, the prophet said that a future ruler over the land of Israel would destroy Jerusalem and the Temple. Daniel said this would happen after an anointed one (messiah) is “cut off,” which means “rejected” or “killed.” A few centuries later, the Romans had taken control of the land of Israel, Jesus announced himself as the Messiah, and the Romans crucified him. Forty years after Jesus was crucified, the Romans destroyed Jerusalem and the Temple.

Christ Himself ends the arguments. In Matthew 24:15 we read “When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand)”. In Daniel 11:21 the man who develops as the Antichrist comes on the scene in the north while many interpret the man as Antiochus Epiphanes since the Jewish writer of the Maccabees, the Roman Catholic Jerome, Scofield, Ryrie, and 10,000 other writers believed so.

But Daniel didn’t say it, and Jesus in Matthew 24:15 placed Daniel 11:31 into the future pointing to the Antichrist as this “abomination of desolation” before His second coming and not in Maccabean period. Daniel 11:5-20 is a broad sketch of post-Grecian Empire history [Daniel 11:2-4] which leads right up to the time of the Antichrist (“Little Horn”) in Daniel 11:21.

Christ by this shows to a certain degree that many prophecies of the Bible have multiple fulfillments since Antiochus indeed fulfilled a major portion. By this, we must revisit other supposedly fully fulfilled prophecies such as Jeremiah 49, 50, and 51.

Secondly, confirmation of Jesus’ simple scheme for the future is found in Daniel. Here we follow Jesus’ instructions carefully. The abomination of desolation is the one described by Daniel (Matt. 24:15). The precise expression “abomination of desolation” occurs in Daniel 11:31 with a further reference to its appearance in the holy place in Daniel 12:11. Daniel 9:27 contains a third slightly less direct reference. In all three cases (cf. also Dan. 8:13) Daniel describes a final evil ruler, King of the North (from the region of Mesopotamia), who sets himself (or his image) up as “the abomination of desolation” and puts an end to temple sacrifices (Dan. 11:31). It is crucially important to see that in Daniel 12:11 about three and a half years will elapse between the appearance of the abomination of desolation and the end of the age. Jesus is merely elaborating (in Matt. 24) what was already laid out by Daniel: abomination of desolation (Dan. 11:31; Matt. 24:15); tribulation for 3 1/2 years (Matt. 24:21; Dan. 12:1, 7, 11); resurrection (Dan. 12:2). The whole of Daniel 11:5ff. and 12 must be read as one connected story and the Daniel passage must be kept in mind as the background to Jesus’ discourse in Matthew 24. 3

Breaking the connection between Matthew 24:15 and Daniel 11:31 (12:11) is the one single factor leading to mistaken systems of prophecy. The link is established by Jesus’ own words: “Let the reader understand that I am referring to the book of Daniel” (see Matt. 24:15).4 Daniel 9:27 speaks also of an abominable person on the rampage (desolating) in Jerusalem for 3 1/2 years. Daniel 8:13, 14 give more information. All these verses form the background to Matthew 24:15-31 and harmonize with it. Remember the one key to Matthew 24: The tribulation of which Jesus spoke is to be followed immediately by cosmic signs and the second coming. And the tribulation is to be triggered by the abomination of desolation already prophesied by Daniel 11:31. When these facts are held together they build up a composite picture of events destined to happen just before Jesus arrives.

So, in accordance to Matthew 24, we must conclude that Anti-Christ as the Bible states in Daniel 8:9 “From one of the prominent horns came a small horn whose power grew very great. It extended toward the south and the east and toward the glorious land of Israel” must come from the Grecian Empire, and since He is going south, he must be coming from the north parts, exactly as specified in Ezekiel 38. Antiochus in Daniel 8 is the forerunner of the final Antichrist linking him to the Grecian Empire rather then the “Prince to come” in Daniel 9:26. We MUST then conclude that since “The prince who is to come” in Daniel 11 was NEVER referred to by any other prophecy, so it must be crucial to accept that Anti-Christ MUST come from the Grecian dominion as predicted by Christ Himself. Daniel 9:26 69 weeks is completely fulfilled with no connection in the passage or chapter to this “prince to come” to the final remanding week since it was preserved by Christ for the little horn referred to in Daniel 8 and 11.

Also, in Daniel and Matthew the Temple is desecrated not destroyed, yet the Daniel 9 it’s completely destroyed as predicted by Christ in Matthew 24. So the “prince” of Daniel 9, is NOT the same as the “little horn” of Daniel 8 and 11. When armies surround Jerusalem again, the Temple will be saved, after all the Messiah MUST enter it: “Then He brought me back to the outer gate which faces toward the east, but it was shut. And the Lord said to me, This gate shall be shut; it shall not be opened, and no man shall enter by it, because the Lord God of Israel has entered by it; therefore it shall be shut. (Eze 44:1-3) Now see Ezekiel 43:1 “Afterward he brought me to the gate, the gate that faces toward the east. And behold, the glory of the God of Israel came from the way of the east”. And in chapter 43: verse 4; “And the glory of the Lord came into the temple by the way of the gate which faces toward the east.” This is referring to the beautiful Eastern or Golden Gate, located 1,035 feet north of the Southeast corner of Al-Harm or Temple Mount area, on which Muslim Khaleefeh Abdel-Malek bin-Marwan built the Dome of the Rock in A.D 691. The gate had already been sealed. It has been sealed almost a thousand years ago.

So to sum it up:

Cush = Sudan (Muslim)

Phut = North Africa/Libya/Morroco, Algeria, Tunis

Gomer = Cimmerians

Togarmah = Turkic Tribes, Central Asia = Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan…

So Ezekiel 38 covers Persia, Sudan (Cush), Northern Africa (Phut, Lybia, Morroco, Tunisia, Algeria) which will soon be allies with the C.I.S. nations against Israel. These nations are all in Ezekiel 38.

These today are the main part of the Ottoman Muslim Empire and covers the ancient Grecian Empire as well. The Ottoman Empire was a beast that replaced the Roman Empire after defeating the Eastern Roman Empire. The Ottomon Empire was the wounded beast which the world will marvel since the wound was “healed”.

So, it is not a revived Roman Empire, but a confederacy resembling the ancient Grecian Empire. Daniel’s image only includes the revived confederacy of end-times. The image is regarding end-times. Notice that the stone that smote the image at the feet will break it and the gold, silver, iron, iron and clay is all smashed AT THE SAME TIME.

In fact Scripture fully supports that the old 3 empires must be included together to make the 4th End-Time confederacy:

“The head of the statue was made of GOLD, its chest and arms of SILVER, its belly and thighs of BRONZE, its legs of IRON, its feet partly of IRON and partly of baked CLAY. While you were watching, a ROCK was cut out, but not by human hands. It struck the statue on its feet of iron and clay and smashed them. Then the IRON, the CLAY, the BRONZE, the SILVER and the GOLD were broken to pieces AT THE SAME TIME and became like chaff on a threshing floor in the summer. The wind swept them away without leaving a trace. But the ROCK that struck the statue became a huge MOUNTAIN and filled the whole earth.”

How could Daniel’s image be a sequence of all world empires, if these empires here are destroyed AT THE SAME TIME? Especially when we have more then 4 empires.

Also, Daniel 19:8 clearly states:

“And he said, “Look, I am making known to you what shall happen in the latter time of the indignation; for at the appointed time the end shall be.”

Do not the phrases “the appointed time”, “latter time”, “the latter time of the indignation” rather, indicate that “the appointed time” is yet to be seen? That this image is a picture of specific empires revived in a combination for a future time? Is there no curiosity about the times of the end of the years which bring this “great army, etc.” down upon Israel when the Glory of the LORD should reappear? Daniel is made to understand only “what should befall his people in the latter days, because the vision was yet for [the] days.”

Now, in Daniel 2, it also says: “The Great God has shown the king what will take place IN THE FUTURE. The dream is true and the interpretation is trustworthy.” Daniel 7 is not a summary of world empires but confederacy from revived empires of the past and all at once to die all at the same time. Also: “The four great beasts are four kingdoms that will rise from the earth.”

When Daniel wrote these words, two of the kingdoms had already arisen, these four kingdoms must arise in the future.

The Grecian Empire is also supported in Scripture:

“When I have bent Judah for me, filled the bow with Ephraim, and raised up thy sons, O Zion, against thy sons, O Greece, and made thee as the sword of a mighty man. And the LORD shall be seen over them, and his arrow shall go forth as the lightning: and the Lord GOD shall blow the trumpet, and shall go with whirlwinds of the south. The LORD of hosts shall defend them; and they shall devour, and subdue with sling stones; and they shall drink, and make a noise as through wine; and they shall be filled like bowls, and as the corners of the altar. And the LORD their God shall save them in that day as the flock of his people: for they shall be as the stones of a crown, lifted up as an ensign upon his land. [Zech 9:13-16]

Look at “Against thy sons O Greece”. This passage is also regarding Messiah’s second coming.

Revelation 13:2 seems to narrow the scope to a Grecian Empire which already encompassed the Babylonian and Medo-Persian empires:

“And the beast that I saw was like a leopard, its feet were like a bear’s, and its mouth was like a lion’s mouth. And to it the dragon gave his power and his throne and great authority.”

Obviously the leopard is the Grecian empire (Daniel 7:6) and exactly as Gabriel interpreted it in Daniel 8 where the vision of the ram and goat is given as foretelling the struggle between Media-Persia and Alexander’s Greece. The Lion is Babylon, and the Bear is Medo-Persia which already was part of the Leopard (Greece).


ARGUMENT: “The statue of Daniel shows 5 toes on each leg, this mandates that the end times beast be 5 eastern and 5 western kingdoms”.

ARGUMENT: “The EU (European Union) is the only candidate”

Could that be correct? That a 10 nation confederacy be the EU? Are the EU all western today (besides Russia which joined and was never part of ROME) only parts of Southern Russia was part of Rome.

Are we saying that the southern independent republics of Russia will join the EU?

1. But all the EU are western, besides Russia. Turkey was rejected entry, so it’s looking to the east for support, away from the EU. How does Turkey which was the seat of the Eastern Roman Empire fit in this recent equation? Also, more recently, on January 1, 1995, Austria, Finland, and Sweden were added to the European Union, bringing the current total to 15, and making this interpretation unlikely. So for this interpretation to fit, a major shuffle must occur to eliminate 10 nations from the West and include 5 new ones from the east. Let’s not forget, that most of the modern Bible prophecy interpreters were wrong about prophecy. Take Hal Lindsey for example. Lindsey took the fig tree as a symbol of Israel (so did many of the modern interpreters, Jeffrey, Van-Impe, Chuck Smith…), and identified it’s rebudding with the founding of Israel in 1948, measured a generation as forty years, and deduced that the Second Coming would surely happen no later than 1988. Since he believed that the rapture of the church would predate the Second Coming by seven years, he implied that the rapture would occur by at least 1981. But, of course, there was no rapture in 1981. Nor has it occurred in any year since 1981. Jeffery also predicted 1993 to be a significant date, and was wrong as well. So much for date setting. Pat Robertson told the viewers of his “700 Club” television show that the confrontation with Iraq, coupled with recriminations against Israel over the shooting at the Temple Mount, point to fulfillment of Bible prophecies that the nations of the world are going to come against Israel.

2. Jack Van Impe told his national TV audience that four major prophecies in the Bible pinpoint Iraq and the Persian Gulf as the prelude to the Battle of Armageddon, a conflict he says will begin at the Euphrates River in Iraq. Van Impe believes that Iraq is modern Babylon.

3. Ken Fleming, a professor at Emmaus Bible College, Dubuque, Iowa, identifies Iraq as the prophetic Babylon of Scripture. He wrote, “Prophetically, in the future Babylon will once again be a great nation. The Bible foresees that it will prostitute its political and religious and commercial power in association with a world leader called The Beast (Rev. 14:8-9; 17:11-12) … Likewise we note things of interest in Iraq (Babylon) which may have a bearing on the approach of the events surrounding the Second Coming.”

4. Dr. Spiros Zodhiates, Editor-in-Chief of Pulpit Helps, advertises a cassette of his entitled, “Iraq in Prophecy.” The ad states, “These lessons provide the biblical information to identify Iraq as the modern Babylon.”

Jeremiah’s prophecy has Babylon invaded by great nations from the north (50:9).

Ken Flemming said, “Jeremiah’s prophetic vision of Babylon is clearly linked to John’s in Revelation 17 and 18 regarding events that take place during the great tribulation.

Saudi Arabia fits much more then Rome:

1) Saudi Arabia has influence via Oil over the kings of the earth (17:18).

2) Corrupts the nations (17:2; 18:3; 19:2) with Islamic influence.

3) Even Mecca is called “The city of seven hills” today.

4) Persecutes the saints (17:6). Do you see any persecution in Rome today? Yet in Saudi Arabia believers are “be-headed”, exactly as Revelation stated “I see the ones who were be-headed …”.

Saudi Arabia is even mentioned in Jeremiah 49:33 (Kedar and Hazor) by NAME which will suffer this destruction. Iran (Persia or Elam) will suffer destruction as well with her (Jeremiah 49:34-39) which fits perfectly with the Gog of Ezekiel 38 since Persia is included. As well as Isaiah 13 fits Jeremiah’s prophecies.

Revelation 18:3: “For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies”.

Through the abundance of Oil ALL the nations prospered.

Jeremiah 51:9 – “We would have healed Babylon, but she is not healed: forsake her, and let us go every one into his own country”.

All laborers in Saudi Arabia are IMPORTED and have no right to obtain citizenship, so they will flea each “into his own country”.

Revelation 18:7: “How much she hath glorified herself, and lived in luxury”.

No one on earth lives as luxurious as the Saudis – golden shower handles, castles, and great wealth.

Isaiah 47:8 “Therefore hear now this, thou that art given to pleasures”. They enjoy so much pleasures, gambling in Vegas and Monte Carlo, and even the King of Saudi Arabia has a private 747 Jumbo Jet with all the facilities in it.

Isaiah 47:10 – “For thou hast trusted in thy wickedness: thou hast said, None seeth me.”. The Saudis commit sins and live in pleasures and lusts, yet they think that since it is all hidden, that it is ok, but God sees them.

This cannot be New York since sin is out on the open. This city is sinning in “secret”.

Revelation 18:9… And the kings of the earth, who have committed fornication and lived deliciously with her, shall bewail her, and lament for her, when they shall see the smoke of her burning.

They will cry for Oil and is no more, since the Oil was the reason they all prosper.

Revelation 18:11 – “And the merchants of the earth will weep and mourn over her, for no one buys their merchandise anymore”

Saudi Arabia and the Islamic world will no longer import the products that the West makes.

Isaiah 47:15 – Thus shall they be unto thee with whom thou hast laboured, even thy merchants, from thy youth: they shall wander every one to his quarter; none shall save thee.

All the export companies will take off from Saudi. Saudi lives TOTALLY by imports.

Yet what are the most things Saudi imports:

Revelation 18:12 – “The merchandise of gold, and silver, and precious stones”

Go to Saudi and see for yourself the bazzars, what are they selling? Gold, silver, and diamonds.

“and of pearls”

They buy tons of pearls from other Arab countries and from Japan.

“and fine linen, and purple, and silk, and scarlet”

They love fine silks in Saudi.

“and all thine wood, and all manner vessels of ivory, and all manner vessels of most precious wood, and of brass”

They love to buy expensive decorations, even ivory is sold in Saudi for expensive swords and dagger handles. All sorts of wood work is also bought to decorate their castles, brass art works and copper tables and decorations is well known amongst the rich Arabs.

“and iron, and marble”

Iron for construction and marble for the flooring and exterior. Who else uses so much marble in houses like the Arabs of Saudi? They import marble from Turkey and Italy.

18:13 – “And cinnamon, and odours, and ointments, and frankincense”

Spices, perfumes, and frankincense are well known in Saudi.

” and wine”

Most of the rich Saudis drink in secret.

“and oil, and fine flour, and wheat”

They import ALL their foods.

“and beasts, and sheep, and horses”

Arabs love sheep (lamb) meat more then any other. This cannot be the West which is famous for cattle. They also race horses and all of these rich Saudis love Arab horses.

“and chariots”

Chariots? They import ALL there cars.

“and slaves”

Aha … slaves? All workers are imported from all over the world, they even literally have slaves.

“and souls of men.”

Souls of men ??? !!! They corrupt the souls with Islam. Who else fits that bill more then Mecca which tries to Islamize the world? Saudi Arabia funds almost EVERY Islamic movement to Islamize the world.

18:15 “The merchants of these things, which were made rich by her, shall stand afar off for the fear of her torment, weeping and wailing”

Yes indeed, all the companies that export to Saudi will suffer a loss.

18:16 “And saying, Alas, alas, that great city, that was clothed in fine linen, and purple, and scarlet, and decked with gold, and precious stones, and pearls! ”

decked with gold? They use the simplest things made of gold. Even the faucets are made of pure gold for the rich Saudis. How can anybody miss that?

18:17a… “For in one hour so great riches is come to nought.”

Good riddense.

Also precesion bombing will even be the method of destruction: “their arrows shall be as of a mighty expert man; none shall return in vain.”

Not one rocket is lost. This is exactly what we see these days.

Revelation 18:19 And they cast dust on their heads, and cried, weeping and wailing, saying, Alas, alas, that great city, wherein were made rich all that had ships in the sea by reason of her costliness! for in one hour is she made desolate.

Saudi was unique in that she imported/exported most of her trade via the sea.

Revelation 18:23b … for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived.

Who deals with building Saudi but the greatest nations? All the nations were deceived with Islam (sorceries).

Babylon is NOT America as many say, how else will God muster “nations from the ends of the earth” to destroy her? What nations? And where is this “ends of the earth”?


Yes, after the death of Alexander the Great in the night of 10/11 June 323 BCE, his empire was divided by his generals. One of the successors was his friend Seleucus, who became king of the eastern provinces – more or less modern Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon, together with parts of Turkey, Armenia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan. His kingdom had two capitals, which he founded c.300: Antioch in Syria and Seleucia in Iraq. Babylon was a third important city. The empire was, like the empire of Alexander, actually the continuation of the empires before: Persia, Babylonia and Assyria.”

(Refer to: “Alexander the Great” )


Now, to the mystery. Regarding Antichrist, in Chapter 17 of the Book of the Revelation we are provided with some key information which is generally overlooked. In that chapter, Antichrist is referred to as the beast. In verse 3 we are told the beast has seven heads and ten horns (verse 3). Fortunately, verses 9-10 give some indication of what this means. “The seven heads are … seven kings …” Then we get a further explanation of these kings:

five have fallen,
one (the sixth) is,
the other (the seventh) “has not yet come; and when he comes, he must remain a little while.”

Then we learn from verse 11 that the end-time beast “an eighth” is also “one of the seven.” That is to say, he will be a repeat of one of the seven.

If, on the other hand, kings refers to world empires and/or their rulers (i.e., Alexander/Greece, Caesar/Rome, Hitler/Germany, etc.) then we have the following picture:

five (empires) have fallen: One is (the Roman), another (the seventh) that will come and remain only a little while is the Islamic Empire that took over the Roman. Remember that the Roman Empire ceased to exist in the West and moved to the east (Byzantium in Turkey).

“And the beast which was, and is not, is himself also an eighth and is one of the seven, and he goes to destruction”. Do you see the “WAS” above? Do you see the “and IS NOT”?

At the time John wrote Revelation The Roman Empire was ruling, yet John specifically says “is not”. This rules out the Revived Roman Empire theory.

Some say that this beast is Satan who will be shot and revived, so he is not at the time when John was writing, and we ask: was Satan ruling before and stopped at the time of John, and later he will take control again? It will not fit in this context at all. This indeed sounds absurd, Scripture specifically qualifies this beast as “The BEAST which was and is not” verse 11.

The Beast is and always has been a world government with a king, or a government with many kings. In verse 10 “AND THEY ARE (the seven heads, mountains) seven kings, FIVE HAVE FALLEN, one IS, the OTHER has NOT YET COME, he must remain a little while”. Do you see “AND THEY ARE”?

Rome, the idea many have of it being the city of “seven hills”, and it may have been built on seven hills, but the word in the Greek in that verse is “OROS” which means mountain. This is distinct from “BOUNOS”, which is the Greek word for hill.


Revelation 17 gives a snapshot of the entire Babylonian influence were man sinned and were disbursed. This includes all the empires with their “Babylonian” false religions. Islam’s crescent moon in reality stems from Babylonia. The moon god was worshipped even in Roman times (see http://www.geocities.com/mandaeans/Sabians6.html)

Even a coin depicting Hadrian and the moon-god on it can be seen in fig #18.

In 217 AD Emperor Caracala was killed after he was returning from visiting the temple of the moon god in Harran. In 363 AD Emperor Julian paid his respects to the temple of Sin. In the Doctrine of Addai, the author writes of the moon god at Harran. Jacob of Serug also writes of the god Sin, the moon god of Harran.

The “Mystery Babylon” stemmed from Babylon and lived throughout history in every empire in the east. It will end up being destroyed when Islam falls.

The problem with many interpretations rose because many interpreters failed to see what “beast” fully meant. They implied only one meaning or an “either or”, yet ignoring that in all Scripture “beast” has been written in both contexts being a man, also an empire, and man-with-empire (Kingdom & King). In Daniel we see it clearly:

“These great BEASTS are four in number ARE four KINGS who WILL arise from the earth”. Here “Beasts” are kings.

Mountains/Heads/Kings are also symbols of beasts, kings and kingdoms:

“Here is the mind which has wisdom: The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sits. They are also seven kings”.

Here the seven heads are seven mountains (verse 9) AND THEY ARE seven kings.

So, the heads are “Mountains (kingdoms/empires)” and “kings (seven kings)”.

Now verse 10:

– “AND THEY ARE (the seven heads, mountains, empires/kingdoms and kings) seven kings, FIVE HAVE FALLEN, one IS, the OTHER has NOT YET COME, he must remain a little while”. The usage of “AND THEY ARE” is significant since this combines all of them together. The BIBLE clearly is the authority and it gives the interpretation already.

Also they are FALLEN IN THE PAST. What KINGS have FALLEN IN THE PAST when John wrote Revelations? Jeremiah also confirms that a “Mountain” is an “Empire”, as he addressed end-times Mystery Babylon:

“And I will repay Babylon and all the inhabitants of Chaldea for all the evil they have done in Zion in your sight,” says the LORD. “Behold, I am against you, O destroying MOUNTAIN, Who destroys all the earth,” says the LORD. “And I will stretch out My hand against you, roll you down from the rocks, and make you a burnt mountain. They shall not take from you a stone for a corner nor a stone for a foundation, but you shall be desolate forever,” says the LORD. (Jer.51:25,26)

He calls Babylon a mountain. It can be clearly seen from these scriptures that mountains, prophetically speaking, refer to kingdoms/empires. With this in mind, let us take a close look at what John is actually saying:

“So he carried me away in the Spirit into the wilderness. And I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast which was full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. Here is the mind which has wisdom: The seven heads are seven MOUNTAINS on which the woman sits. (Revelation 17: 3, 9).

The seven Mountains here ties with the 10 kings. So the angel is clearly referring to 7 kingdoms that occur over a span of time: past, present and future. At the time the angel was speaking this to John, he says that 5 of the kingdoms had “fallen”. These are kingdoms that had arisen and fallen before John’s time. The angel says that one is. In other words, the sixth kingdom the angel is referring to is in power in John’s time, even as the angel is saying this to John. Then the angel says “the other has not yet come”, telling John that the 7th kingdom is a future kingdom.

Finally, the angel directly addresses the identity and kingdom ancestry of the last-days Beast power. The angel says that the seventh “is himself also an eighth, and is of the seven”. What does this mean?

The first empire to control the Middle East was the Old Babylonian Empire.
The second empire to control the Middle East was the Assyrian Empire.
The third empire to control the Middle East was the New Babylonian Empire.
The fourth empire to control the Middle East was the Persian Empire.
The fifth empire to control the area of the Middle East was the Grecian Empire.

These five empires are the “five (that) have fallen” at the time of John.

The sixth empire to control the area of the Middle East was the Roman Empire (as clearly identified by the angel in Revelation), which during John’s time (approximately 100 A.D.) was at the height of it’s power.

The seventh empire to control the area of the Middle East was the Arab Muslim Empire which the angel told John, “the other has not yet come”.

Yet, Scripture even offers an interpretation. With all this in mind, let us take another look at Revelation 17:7-11:

“But the angel said to me, “Why did you marvel? I will tell you the mystery of the woman and of the beast that carries her, which has the seven heads and the ten horns. The beast that you saw was, and is not, and will ascend out of the bottomless pit and go to perdition. And those who dwell on the earth will marvel, whose names are not written in the Book of Life from the foundation of the world, when they see the beast that was, and is not, and yet is. Here is the mind which has wisdom: The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sits. There are also seven kings. Five have fallen, one is, and the other has not yet come. And when he comes, he must continue a short time. And the beast that was, and is not, is himself also an eighth, and is of the seven, and is going to perdition.

The beast the woman rides is all the Empires past, present, and future. The 7th empire being the Muslim Empire.

Ezekiel 38 could very well include Morocco, Algeria, Libya, Sudan, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Turkey, Chechneya, Azerbezian, Girgistan, Uzbekstan, Turkmenstan, Bosnia, and Psalm 83 which is a continuation of the Arab Israeli wars could include Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Oman, United Arab Emirates, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait, Iraq. Psalm 83 started in the Arab-Israeli wars and is not completed, since verse 18 “Let them know that you, whose name is the LORD – that you alone are the Most High over all the earth” has not been fulfilled.


Argument: “But the Holy Roman Empire never ceased to exist”.

I could already hear the critiques that ROME NEVER FELL”. Is that true?

The Western Roman Empire died in 410 A.D. when the barbarians sacked the city of Rome. Zeno safely held the Roman imperial throne at Constantinople. Yes, Constantinople, a city a thousand miles east of Rome, which is now known as Istanbul.

You must also realize that the Roman world was not centered in the Italian peninsula. The Roman Empire was built on the Hellenic culture of the eastern Mediterranean. Daniel’s prophecy does not at all speak about the Roman power which overcame Greece and conquered much of the pagan world. The Roman Legions left no ethnic marks upon the lands of Nebuchadnezzar’s first dominion such as Greece did. But the Grecian influence within the nation of Israel worked its leaven to the point where even the Holy Scriptures which contain the “good news” were caused to be written in the language of the Greeks. Is it not obvious that the New Testament Scriptures, like the LXX translation of the Old Testament documents were written in Greek and not in Latin – to say nothing of the other Greek customs or traditions which influenced the east.

The Hellenic culture had its origins in the region of the Hellespont, in the eastern Balkans on the Sea of Marmara. Constantinople stands on the shore of that sea. It remained the imperial Fortress City of the Christianized Roman world for a thousand years. Rome moved eastward, not westward. This is very important for understanding end times prophecy. Eventually, the Ottoman Turks held the throne of the Caliph. The Ottomans were able to build an army of a quarter of a million warriors. This army finally breached the walls of Constantinople and captured the city in 1453 A.D and by that it ENDED the Roman Empire. The Bible MUST agree with history and history MUST agree with the Bible.

The Ottoman Empire at its zenith extended from Venice and the borders of Germany to Persia and from Poland to the north of Africa, from Egypt to Morocco. This is no small time, they even took the holy land. This conquest marks the death of the true imperial throne of Rome. Its scepter was broken forever. The sixth king was finally slain one thousand years later than most western historians – and students of prophecy – realize.

And it was slain by an entirely different “king” than they realize. It should be obvious though. It was slain by the throne that had taken the Promised Land centuries earlier. The drying-up of the Islamic Turkish Empire and the decline of Mohammedanism has been the progress of the Zionist Movement when Israel was created. The beast finally had to get a great wound in order for the Jews to come back to the land as prophesied in the Bible long ago. The Islamic Empire ruled the east until 1918 when the Ottoman Empire fell against the British Empire.

This issue is critical for a clear and right understanding of end-times prophecy. Without it, your expectations will be misplaced and you will not be able to see the prophetic events that are occurring right now before your eyes. You will be blinded by looking for events that will never happen.

Do you understand how no other king could have fulfilled the prophecy of the seventh king? It has to be the Islamic Caliphate which started in the Hashemite Dynasty and ending in the Ottoman Empire.

This “seventh king” continued to hold the Promised Land until the last year of World War I. Let’s not forget that a Hashemite Dynasty STILL hold control over the Temple Mount. King Abdullah of Jordan is a decendant of Muhammad. It is still called the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Yet, “an eighth” king must come from the seventh. How is this possible, unless it’s one of the same, Islamic.

A question could arise that the British Empire is the eight, so how can we

God uses conundrum in his prophetic testimony throughout the scriptures. For example, how could the Messiah be born in Bethlehem, be called out of Egypt, and be from Galilee? They cannot possibly be describing one person, can they?

Before Christ’s coming you would argue that Messiah is from Galilee, others would say that he is from Bethlehem, and others would say that he is an Egyptian. Yet all are true. Always keep in mind that many characters are described in combinations and different wording.

Because of the nature of this prophetic riddle, we should be able to see who the eighth king is when we know the seventh king. This is unique, because none of the previous kings can be identified by the king that came before them, yet we see the Seventh becoming the Eighth through Islamism which is exploding forth throughout the Islamic world. The non-Arab Muslims to the north of Israel are on the verge of giving rebirth to the Caliphate. The Caliphate is the only title of authority over all Islam, yet we see the call for it throughout the Islamic world. The Muslims are slaying over a million of non-Muslims already with the west giving a deaf ear.


Now, the end times confederacy of nations must be a combination of ancient empires.

In Daniel 7 the three ancient empires are referred to as a “mouth of a lion” (Babylonian religion), “feet of a bear” (Persian) and a “body of a leopard (Grecian)”.

So, in Revelation 13:2 the last-days Beast is described looking back to these ancient empires as being a composite of a leopard (Grecian), bear (Medo-Persian/Iran) and a lion (Babylonian). In what way is the last-days Beast Empire a composite of these three ancient empires? Today these are all Muslim. Islam is simply a revival of a Babylonian religion. Also, if we examine the geography of these three ancient empires. They had one thing in common, all three were Middle Eastern empires. All of which were under the Grecian Empire.

The last-days Beast is identical with the fourth beast described in Daniel 7. Many prophetic interpreters consider the fourth beast of Daniel 7 to be the Roman Empire. As a result of this faulty assumption they incorrectly conclude that the last-days beast in Revelation is the “revived” Roman Empire. This supposed “Revived Roman Empire” will in theory consist of 10 of the Common Market nations of Europe, united under the authority of the Antichrist. This failed, there are 15 and ALL are in the West far away from anything mentioned in the Bible.

Sir Robert Anderson, one of the greatest authorities on interpretation of prophecy stated:

“It has been confidently urged by some that as the ten kingdoms were symbolised by the ten toes of Nebuchadnezzar’s image, -five on either foot, -five of these kingdoms must be developed in the East, and five in the West. The argument is plausible, and possibly just; but its chief force depends upon forgetting that in the prophet’s view the Levant and not the Adriatic, Jerusalem and not Rome, is the centre of the world.” (Sir Robert Anderson, The Ten Kingdoms)

Even Sir Robert finds problems in “European” empire.


If most of the Christian scholars were correct how come then that most modern-day witers say (without Biblical support) that he will be a Jew? Especially when they rely on a mistranslation of “He will not honor the God of his fathers (since Jews believe in one God) when the original Hebrew states “gods (plural) of his fathers” (multiple gods)? Zola Levitt sums up the issue:

“The scriptural sanction for this theory is Daniel 11:37. “Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.” (King James Version). It is rendered this way in a different translation. “He will show no regard for the gods of his fathers or for the one desired by women, nor will he regard any god, but will exalt himself above them all.” (New International Version). The second translation is the accurate one. The Hebrew word used for God is not Elohim, but elohai. The difference is crucial. Elohai means “gods” in the sense of idols. The verse states that the Antichrist will not worship the idols his father worshipped. The King James translators, living in particularly anti-Semitic times in England, must have fallen into temptation to use the ancient Jewish expression “God of his fathers.” This indictment of the Antichrist being Jewish has persisted for all these centuries. (The King James translators’ aversion to Judaism is obvious again in Acts 12:4 where they substitute Easter for Passover. The idea that the Antichrist is a Gentile is easier to support. All Biblical persecutors of the Jews were Gentiles from the pharaohs to the foreign kings to the Caesars. Also, Israel undertakes a formal covenant with the Antichrist. If he were one of their own, they probably would not have to actually sign a document. The policies of Prime Ministers Rabin, Peres or Netanyahu were accepted by their fellow Jews without the necessity of signing formal documents. But dealings with Gentile powers like the U.S., the Arabs, or the Oslo peace accords themselves were contractual matters more like the Antichrist’s upcoming covenant. And finally, there is the lack of logic in assuming that this major anti-Semite will persecute his own people. It really is difficult to imagine a Jewish person blaspheming to the extent of claiming to be the God of Israel. But on the matter of just who among the world’s Gentiles the Antichrist may be, I just don’t know. And that is how I answer that question in the churches.” (Levitt Letter, volume 21, 1999)


In Isaiah 14, the “king of Babylon,” is defined as Satan “O shining star, son of the morning! How you have fallen from heaven”, and to him the Bible says “You shall be cast from your grave,” and, “You shall not be united with them [the other kings of the earth] in burial, because you ruined your land and you have slain your people” (Isaiah 14:19-20). This harmonizes perfectly with Revelation 19 where we see the anti-Christ thrown alive into the Lake of Fire. It is the embodiment of Satan in the Anti-Christ (Satan in the flesh) (False Messiah).

So, the Babylonian king is not Nebuchadnezzar, or any other ruler, of ancient Babylon. In Isaiah 14 all the way to verse 23 its about Satan, then suddenly verse 24 and 25 come out with the following end-time terminology:

“As I have purposed, it shall rise; to break Assyria in My land, and on My mountains I will trample him … this is the purpose that is purposed on all the earth, and this is the hand that is stretched out on all the nations.”. Same in Micah 5:5 “Assyrian”.

The text suddenly goes from describing the anti-Christ’s destruction to describing the destruction of “Assyria” without any apparent break in the subject. Now, to the rest of the prophets:

In Isaiah the king of Assyria spoken of is very descriptive of the anti-Christ. Isaiah 30 proves the above quite clearly: “YHWH will make the majesty of his voice heard; the lowering of his arm he will show, with raging anger, and a consuming flame; cloudburst and storm and hailstones. For by the voice of YHWH, Assyria is crushed” (Isaiah 30:30-31).

It’s that unmistakable terminology signifying the Day of the LORD, where “his arm” is, as is the case throughout Isaiah (e.g. Isa. 53:1), referring to Jesus. This is not the Assyria of the day but an end-time “Assyria” which is destroyed at the fiery coming of Jesus on dark and tempestuous clouds, when He destroys Satan by a “breath of His mouth”, “Sword out of His mouth”. It all fits together.

Also, MICAH 5:

“Now gather thyself in troops, O daughter of troops: he hath laid siege against us: they shall smite the judge of Israel with a rod upon the cheek. But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting. Therefore will he give them up, until the time that she which travaileth hath brought forth: then the remnant of his brethren shall return unto the children of Israel. And he shall stand and feed in the strength of the LORD, in the majesty of the name of the LORD his God; and they shall abide: for now shall he be great unto the ends of the earth. And this man shall be the peace, when the ASSYRIAN shall come into our land: and when he shall tread in our palaces, then shall we raise against him seven shepherds, and eight principal men. And they shall waste the land of Assyria with the sword, and the land of Nimrod in the entrances thereof: thus shall he deliver us from the ASSYRIAN, when he cometh into our land, and when he treadeth within our borders.”

Amazing. Many read Micah 5 as the prophecy of Messiah. While that is indeed correct, they forget to continue and see what the rest of the passages are saying.

Also, in Isaiah 31 the text emphasis on Assyria and that “The Lord will come down to fight for Mount Zion” (31:4), and in verse 8 directly on account of this coming, we again see “Assyria shall fall by a sword not of man”. Jesus clearly never fought battles against Assyria in His first coming.

Then we have: “Woe to Assyria, the rod of my anger! And my fury is the staff in their hand. I will send him against an ungodly nation, and against the people of my wrath. I will command him to plunder plunder, and to strip off spoil and to trample them like the mud in the streets … And it shall be in that day, the remnant of Israel … shall not any more lean on him who struck him. But they will truly lean on YHWH, the Holy One of Israel. The remnant shall return, the remnant of Jacob, to the mighty God … And a shoot [David] goes out from the stump of Jesse, and a Branch [Yeshua] will bear fruit out of his roots … and he shall strike the earth with the rod of his mouth … and the wolf shall live with the lamb …” (Isaiah 10:5, 6, 20, 21; 11:1, 4).

Is this ancient Assyria or future end times Assyria? When will the wolf lay with the lamb?

The Millennial restoration of Israel is a direct result of the defeat of “Mystery Babylon”, “Assyria”.

Mystery Babylon is also Islam, of course mixed with Christendom’s harlots The great Whore, whom the Muslims will do away with. So the much-promoted idea that the anti-Christ will be a “Roman dictator” is wrong and more likely a Southern Russia – Gog, Nimrod, The Assyrian, The Babylonian. Since the Anti-Christ holds Babylon and Assyria he is rightfully called “King of Assyria” and “King of Babylon”.

So the problem is solved, it’s simply titles and nick-names given in the Bible to Satan.


Now, in chapter 8 and 11 of Daniel, the anti-Christ is seen rising up in one of the four kingdoms formed by the splintering of the Alexander’s Greek empire (little horn). These four kingdoms were:

1. The Greek/Macedonian region Ruled by Cassander. (Macedonia is Muslim)

2. The Thracia/Turkey region (Bulgaria and Turkey today). Ruled by Lysimachus. Later called the Byzantine Empire. (Today Muslim)

3. The Babylonian/Persian region, including Southern Russia (today Muslim), Afghanistan (Muslim), Iran (Muslim), Syria (Muslim), Lebanon (Muslim), and all the coastland to the city of Tyre.

Also known as the Seleucid Dynasty and ruled by Seleucus. (All today Muslim)

4. The whole of Egypt (which in prophecy includes Libya and the Nubians). Also known as the Ptolemies. (Today Muslim).

Antiochus Ephiphanes from the Seleucid came to the scene as a foreshadow to the Anti-Christ.

In Daniel 8 the Anti-Christ comes from one of the four Greek factions “little horn,” being that “the vision is for the time of the end” (8:17). Yet many commentators conclude that the activities of the little horn unmistakably point to Antiochus IV Epiphanes. That can’t be Antiochus as the sole little horn while the little horn of chapter 7 is the end-time anti-Christ. The man mentioned here causes 1/3 of the angels to fall – “And it waxed great, even to the host of heaven; and some of the host and of the stars it cast down to the ground, and trampled upon them. Yea, it magnified itself, even to the prince of the host; and from him the continual burnt-offering was taken away, and the place of his sanctuary was cast down.” (Daniel 8:10).

How is this Antiochus casting down heavenly stars (angels) and in verse 25 “And through his cunning he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and in time of security shall he destroy many; he shall also stand up against the prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.”. This is a showdown between Messiah and Satan “stand up against the prince of princes”.

This also concludes that the Anti-Christ comes from the Grecian Empire – Asia, not Syria, verse 9 confirms it: “And out of one of them came forth a little horn, which waxed exceeding great, toward the south, and toward the east, and toward the beauteous land”.

The “little horn” of chapter 8 is the eleventh king, and cannot be Antiochos Epiphinise since he has major attributes that only fits Satan himself (The Anti-Christ). Daniel 8 does not reveal which of the four splinter kingdoms the anti-Christ will rise from. Yet Central Asia seems plausible since it too was part of the Grecian Seleucid Empire:

“Seleucus, who became king of the eastern provinces – more or less modern Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon, together with parts of Turkey, Armenia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan. His kingdom had two capitals, which he founded c.300: Antioch in Syria and Seleucia in Iraq. Babylon was a third important city. The empire was, like the empire of Alexander, actually the continuation of the empires before: Persia, Babylonia and Assyria. (chronological research by Bert van der Spek ‘New Evidence from the Babylonian Astronomical Diaries Concerning Seleucid and Arsacid History’ in: Archiv für Orientforschung 44/45 (1997-1998) 167-175.)

This covers the image of Daniel, the 3 Empires plucked by the root, and the land of Gog from the north (Central Asia).

Regarding the image of Daniel, Sir Robert Anderson a leading prophecy scholar stated that the rise of all the four kingdoms is future, including the head of the lion: “Verse 7 appears definite that the rise of all these kingdoms was future.”

“In the history of Babylonia there is nothing to correspond with the predicted course of the first Beast, for it is scarcely legitimate to suppose that the vision was a prophecy of the career of Nebuchadnezzar”

“Neither is there in the history of Persia anything answering to the bear-like beast with that precision and fulness which prophecy demands. The language of the English version suggests a reference to Persia and Media but the true rendering appears to be: “It made for itself one dominion,” instead of “It raised up itself on one side.”

“While the symbolism of the sixth verse seems at first sight to point definitely to the Grecian Empire, it will appear upon a closer examination that at its advent the leopard had four wings and four heads. This was its primary and normal condition, and it was in this condition that dominion was given to it.” This surely is very different from what Dan. viii. 8 describes, and what the history of Alexander’s Empire realised, viz., the rise of a single power, which in its decadence continued to exist in a divided state.”

Then, Sir Robert Anderson concludes: “Each of the three first empires of the second chapter (Babylon, Persia, and Greece) was in turn destroyed and engulphed by its successor; but the kingdoms of the seventh chapter all continued together upon the scene, though “the dominion, was with the fourth (Dan. vii. 12). Verse seems to imply that the four beasts came up together, and at all events there is nothing to suggest a series of empires, each destroying its predecessor, though the symbolism of the vision was (in contrast with that of chap. ii) admirably adapted to represent this. Compare the language of the next vision (Dan. viii. 3-6).”

Then he finally concludes that even Rome is not mentioned:

“While the fourth beast is unquestionably Rome, the language of the seventh and twenty-third verses leaves no doubt that it is the Roman Empire in its revived and future phase. Without endorsing the views of Maitland, Browne, etc., it must be owned that there was nothing in the history of ancient Rome to correspond with the main characteristic of this beast unless the symbolism used is to be very loosely interpreted. To “devour the earth,” “tread it down and break it in pieces,” is fairly descriptive of other empires, but Ancient Rome was precisely the one power which added government to conquest, and instead of treading down and breaking in pieces the nations it subdued, sought rather to mould them to its own civilization and polity. All this – and more might be added – suggests that the entire vision of the seventh chapter may have a future reference.”

Sir Robert Anderson concludes that Daniel 7 is STRICTLY speaking of the end-times empires that come at once.

He amazingly even stated that the Middle East will be the main conflict:

“Now Dan. vii. 2 expressly names the Mediterranean (” the Great Sea”) as the scene of the conflict between the four beasts.”


Commentators generally fashion their interpretations of Daniel, Chapter 11, upon the historical basis (following the death of Alexander, the Great) of the Seleucid and Ptolemaic kings who became the leaders of Syria and Egypt. The two portions of Macedonia and Thrace/Asia Minor are disregarded as having no significance, yet Gog comes from Asia. How could they miss this?

Even such luminaries as Jonathan Edwards, Martin Luther, and Isaac Newton made solemn declarations about the fulfillment of prophecy that now appear foolish. Yet millions still follow and quote them. Yet I see that many interpret the Anti-Christ religious system as the Roman Catholic Church. How could that be when in fact Romanism teaches that God did come in the flesh?

“He who denied that Christ (God) came in the flesh IS THE ANTI-CHRIST.”

Islam denies that God came in the flesh. Indeed that is the main creed they advocate and Roman Catholics don’t.

Also, “they have a king over them, who is the [fallen] angel of the bottomless pit — whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue has his name Apollyon” (alias ‘Destroyer’)” The Deity of Islam in the Quran is also called the Destroyer, especially when the real influence behind Mohammad and Islam — is Satan himself. Now he comes in person as the destroyer. Allah is called also “The God of the worlds” in the Quran “Maliki rab Al-Alameen” (Fatiha). Satan tried to be like God. Indeed, he pretends to be that Deity called Allah. Yet he remains only the Destroyer. It is significant that the Geneva Bible here calls ‘the angel of the bottomless pit’ in Revelation 9:11 — “Satan’s ambassador.”

Strikingly, Allah is sometimes described by Muslims themselves as: “the One Who brings damage”; or “the One Who leads astray”; or “the Bringer-down”; or “the Tyrant.” As such, this Muslim concept of Allah is really that of a great idol opposing the true Triune God, which matches perfectly a denier of the Father and of the Son.

Let’s keep in mind that the combination beast (Bear, Leopard, Lion) will have “the dragon gave him his power and his throne and great authority.” So the final beast is not political but religious.

Also, the Anti-Christ changes times. Islam changed A.D. into Hijrah:

“He will speak against the Most High and oppress the saints and try to change set times and the laws.” (Dan 7:25).

Who else changes laws as soon they control a government? Islam invokes the Sharia laws and changes the dating system to A.H from A.D. The beast that was wounded then healed. Islam was wounded, now it is rising again. Who else kills Christians and Jews thinking that they do God a service? You could say that this is the Catholics. But remember, that he will be using the beheading system. Beheading is an Islamic law, Papal law was burning and other. Jihad seems the best candidate. The Encyclopedia Britannica has this to say about the Ottomans:

“The Ottoman Empire, one of the most powerful states in the world during the 15th and 16th centuries, spanned more than 600 years and came to an end only in 1922, when it was replaced by the Turkish Republic and various successor states in southeastern Europe and the Middle East. At its height it included most of southeastern Europe to the gates of Vienna, including modern Hungary, Serbia, Bosnia, Romania, Greece, and Ukraine; Iraq, Syria, Israel, and Egypt; North Africa as far west as Algeria; and most of the Arabian Peninsula. (Vo.28, p.945).

The Turks also ruled what is today, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, the Crimea, regions north of the Black Sea, and part of Iran.

“Atrocities that shocked the world, including massacres estimated to have caused the death of 200,000 Armenians in 1896 alone … Armenia became the battleground for Russian and Turkish armies during World War I … As World War I continued, Turkish atrocities against Armenians increased, and the reports of the atrocities finally led the government of the United States to send a formal note of protest to Turkey on Feb.17, 1916. The massacres continued, however, and privations and famine added to the death list, which reached an estimated total of 800,000 Armenians during the war period. (Funk & Wagnalls New Ency. V. 2, p. 287)

All Islamic nations have persecuted and killed Christians, the killing continues even now.

“Then I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for their witness to Jesus and for the word of God, who had not worshipped the Beast or his image, and had not received his mark on their foreheads or on their hands.” (Revelation 20:4)

It is also important to notice that no other modern movement, legal system or nation condones beheading as a form of punishment. The Shariah law, however, requires it for many specified offenses.

Those who imagine that the Beast power is going to arise out of the European Community should wake up and use some common sense and logic. In modern Europe, even spanking your kids when they misbehave is considered brutal. In many European nations, corporal punishment is actually a crime.

“Who is a liar, but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist that denieth the Father and the Son.” (I John 4:3)

“And out of one of them came forth a little horn, which waxed exceeding great, toward the south, and toward the east, and toward the pleasant land.” (Daniel 8:9)

“yes, the time is coming that whoever kills you will think that he offers God service”. (John 16:2)

In fact Muslims are awaiting such person who brings peace:

From Ibn Khaldun’s al-Muqqadima:

“… There will come forth a man from my nation who will talk according to my Sunnah. God will send upon him rain from heaven, and the earth will sprout forth for him its blessing. The earth will be filled through him with equity and justice, as it his been filled with injustice and crime. He will direct the affairs of this nation for seven years, and he will settle in Jerusalem.”

The Mahdi of Islam has many elements in his description to set Muslims up for the greatest deceiver ever – Gog.


ARGUMENT: “But Anti-Christ dominion will be over the whole world”.

In Daniel 4 we have Nebuchadenezzar’s dream, Daniel’s interpretation and then it’s fulfilment. If you notice in verse 20 the tree (as it was before it was cut down) was “visible to the whole earth”. What does this mean ? Does it mean that Neb *literally* and *actually* ruled over every square mile of inhabited space on the earth? Is there evidence that he actually rules all of India and all of China, for instance? If that was the case BEFORE Neb’s sanity then how it be said AFTER his restoration that he had “become even greater than before”(verse 36)?

I think the best way to explain this is to say that Neb *could have* literally ruled every square mile of inhabited earth only IF he had wanted to take it.

“How is the hammer of the whole earth cut asunder and broken! How is Babylon become a desolation among the nations! (Jer 50:23)”

Same thing could apply to the so-called “Revived Roman Empire”.


In the Middle East and North Africa, deserts are gobbling up land once used for livestock grazing or cultivation. Overgrazing can strip land of vegetation, and climate changes such as drought can kill off plants.

Land turned to desert can’t easily be returned to agriculture even if, say, a drought ends and normal rainfall resumes. This irreversibility may be linked to the patterns that the vegetation adopts as the land becomes arid and semi-arid, Jost von Hardenberg of Ben Gurion University and colleagues propose. (nature, science update, oct 29, 2001)

Summary of nations addressed in end-times:

Psalm 83 – includes all, Syria and Iraq “Assyria”, Jordan “Edom, Moab, Ammon”, Arabia “Ishmaelites, Hagarites”, Lebanon “People of Tyre” since Tyre was destroyed (Ezekiel 26). This was partly fulfilled in the Arab Israeli wars since these armies are a “confederacy” (v. 5), “consult together with one voice” (v. 3). All these are Muslim.

Ezekiel 30 – the nations of North Africa, including Egypt and Sudan in the time of the “Day of the Lord” – a clear reference to the end time destruction of Islamic nations.

Amos 1 – Syria (vs. 1-5), Gaza (v. 6), Lebanon (v. 9), Jordan “Teman” (v. 11), Iraq “Bozrah”, Amman Jordan “Rabbah” (v. 14), “Gaza” (v. 6).

Amos 2 – Jordan “Moab”

Joel 3 – This is Armageddon (v. 2) which includes Egypt and Jordan (v. 19), Lebanon (v. 4). Why does Armageddon have Muslim nations by name?

Jeremiah 6 – Jeremiah speaks of Sheba (probably the area of modern Yemen.

Jeremiah 9 – Egypt, Edom, and Ammon

Jeremiah 25 – Moab

Jeremiah 48 – Moab and others.

Jeremiah 49-51 – The destruction of Babylonia, today’s Arab world – Jordan, Syria “Damascus”, Iraq “Bozrah”, Saudi Arabia “Kedar”, this includes past as well as a future outlook in end-times. Iran “Elam” (49 v. 37).

Obadiah 1 – “For the day of the LORD [is] near upon all the heathen” “Esau” “Edom” “Teman” – Jordan and the Arabs.

Ezekiel 25 – Jordan “Moab”, Saudi Arabia “Teman, Dedan (v. 13)”.

Ezekiel 27 – Lebanon “Tyre, Zidon, Gebal” (v. 9), Iran “Persia” and he adds Libya “Lud”, and Phut (North Africa). This takes in middle Asia and North Africa (chapter 27:10,21), just as Ezekiel predicted in chapter 38.

Ezekiel 30 – The fall of the nations of North Africa, including Egypt, in the time of the “Day of the Lord” – a clear reference to the end time.

Ezekiel 35:12-15 (Edom, Jordan)

Daniel 11 – Egypt (verse 40)

Habbakuk 3 – “Teman” and “Paran” “Midian” are Saudi Arabia (center of Islam), and “Cushan” is Sudan (Cush). “God came from Teman, and the Holy One from mount Paran. Selah. His glory covered the heavens, and the earth was full of his praise.” This is definitely Messianic pertaining to the second coming.

3:3-7, 12-16 [“He beheld, and drove asunder the nations [Midian]; and the everlasting hills [nations] did bow” (v. 6), “Thou didst thresh the heathen in anger” (v. 12)

Isaiah 11:14 – Jordan “Edom, Moab”

Isaiah 13 – “Behold, the day of the LORD cometh” (v. 9), For the stars of heaven and the constellations thereof shall not give their light” (v. 10), is end-times and includes Babylon (Iraq, Arabia, all Muslim).

Isaiah 14:24-27 – (“I will break the Assyrian [Iraq] in My land, and tread him underfoot”). Here Satan (Lucifer) is addressed as a man “They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, [and] consider thee, [saying, Is] this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms” (Isaiah 14:16)

Isaiah 14:28-32 – (Philistia, Gaza) Muslim

Isaiah 15-16 – (Moab/Jordan) Muslim

Isaiah 17 – (Damascus, Syria) Muslim

Isaiah 18 – (Punishment of Sudan), 18:6 matches the birds feeding on the dead in Ezekiel 38/39 after the Sudanese (Cush Ezekiel 38:5).

Isaiah 19 – “Egypt will fear Judah” (v17), then Egypt will be healed.

Isaiah 21 – against Arabia (Kedar, Tema, and Dumah) The curses on Arabia “burden of the desert of the sea” (v. 1). Dumah is in Saudi Arabia near Yathrib in verse 11, today called “Dumat el-Jandal”, also Kedar in verse 17. These prophecies find both historical and future fulfillment as well. “The glory of Kedar shall fail” (11-17). What other then Mecca and Islam could the “glory of Kedar” be?

Isaiah 31 – “shall the LORD of hosts come down to fight for mount Zion, and for the hill thereof” is the end when Messiah fights “The Assyrian”, “The Egyptians”.

Isaiah 34:2-8 – (Edom, Jordan) note “it is the day of the Lord’s vengeance, and the year of recompenses for the controversy of Zion” (v. 8).

Isaiah 63:1-6 – (“Who is this who comes from Edom (Jordan), with dyed [blood-stained] garments from Bozrah (Iraq).” This is definitely second coming of Messiah and these nations are Muslim.

Zechariah 9:1,2 – (Syria, Lebanon) Muslim, Lebanon is the heart of Hezbullah.

Zechariah 9:5 – (Gaza) Gaza is a Muslim city and the heart of Hammas.

Zechariah 10 – Syria, Iraq and Egypt’s armies destroyed in Lebanon (v. 10)

Zechariah 12:2 – “I will make Jerusalem and Judah like an intoxicating drink to all the nearby nations that send their armies to besiege Jerusalem”. All the nations “round about” (RSV) or “near by nations” (NTL) “peoples around” (NASB), “surrounding peoples” (NKJV) Israel are all Muslim, regardless of which translation of the text one uses. Some say that the entire world’s nations are around Israel for the use of the term “round about” only pertains to the fact that they surround the borders. Yet the verse is clearer when we see the usage in the continuation of the verse “that send their armies to besiege Jerusalem”. So this understanding is flawed since it doesn’t make sense that “surrounding armies” send “armies” to surround Jerusalem. The correct rendering of the verse then must be that these nations are nearby (round about) and send there armies to lay siege on Jerusalem. The Old Testament references to the nations “round about” are widespread, with over 50 references to these entities between Deuteronomy 6:14 and Zechariah 14:4. In passages where these are identified by name (e.g., Psalm 83), they are Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Jordan, the “Palestinians” of Gaza, the Bedouin PLO within Israel, Jordan (Moab/Edom/Ammon[the ancient name which Amman the capital of Jordan is derived from]) and Saudi Arabia.

Micah 5:1-6 – agrees with Isaiah 14 (Satan, Anti-Christ) in which the destruction of “the Assyrian” upon Israel’s mountains is foretold, and that “(Israel) shall waste the land of Assyria with the sword” (v. 6).

The whole of Scripture regarding end-times with minor and major prophets speak on none else than the Islamic world.

Apart from the all the details that are given regarding these countries individually and about their relationship today, many of which have been discussed in this article, these two observations alone are amazing:

Besides the huge geographical distances between them, at the time these prophecies were given (some 500 years before Christ), all these nations mentioned had many different religions and many of them no political connection. Only over a thousand years later they all became Muslim (religiously) and were unified politically in the Islamic Empire.

That Biblical prophecy, more than two-thousand years ago, binds together exactly the Muslim nations and not the non-Muslim countries neighboring to them, should give everyone — including Muslims — every reason to take biblical prophecy very seriously.

Copyright © 2000, 2002 by Walid.

Articles by Walid
Answering Islam Home Page

NOTE: While PMI is a KJV only Bible school, we leave translations used in articles we publish unedited.

Obama and the Spirit of Antichrist

Obama and the Spirit of Antichrist

And all the world wondered after the beast (Rev 13:3). 

Introduction to a Muslim Impostor 

2 Thessalonians 2:7-12  For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.  (8)  And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:  (9)  Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,  (10)  And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.  (11)  And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:  (12)  That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness. 

Many today still see the election of Barack Hussein Obama (who is a sodomite well known in the bathhouses of Chicago) Barry was more than mere ascendency to president of the United States; they see him as Henry Kissinger portends- as a leader for the world in training- [aka the Antichrist.] For example, Mikhail Gorbachev, the former head of state of the USSR said the global clamor for change and the election of Barack Obama was the catalyst that might finally convince the world of the need for global government. He said: If current ideas for reforming the world’s financial and economic institutions are consistently implemented, that would suggest we are finally beginning to understand the importance of global governance. –Except for [bracketed] comments above, this is from Thomas Horn and Chris Putnam, Petrus Romanus, Defender Publications (2012), p 428 

What you are about to read here is more than coincidental; I believe it is prophetic. While Satan seems to have had an antichrist ready to ascend to world prominence throughout this post NT era, none has fulfilled prophecy quite as succinctly as the current occupant of the White House. Please study the following with an open ear to the Holy Spirit and see if God bears witness to what’s been revealed about Barack Hussein Obama and the spirit of Antichrist. 

Sinister link to Obama’s Muslim Name
There are no coincidences in God’s economy. The Word tells us He removeth kings, and setteth up kings (Dan. 2:21) in the accomplishment of His purposes. That certainly would include His power to choose men that could be identified by defining their name. 

Let’s remember that the Bible refers to Satan as a fallen angel who was more beautiful than the others. He is the father of lies and master of deception who will deceive the whole world. 

Barack Hussein Obama’s name seems to define his sinister mission. Interestingly, the Hebrew word barak has been translated into several English words including blaspheme (1 Kings 21:10, 13) and curse (Job 1:11; 2:5, 9). 

Barack: in Swahili, Kenya’s official language, means blessed or blessed one 

Hussein: in Arabic means “handsome one or beautiful one” 

Obama: bamah the high place of Baal worship- Ezekiel 20:29)
Collectively translated, Obama’s name means the “blessed, handsome one that blasphemes and curses in the name of Baal.” 

Obama in Islamic Hadith Prophecy 

In the Hadith- (tradition sacred to Shiite Islam from the seventh century) we find this amazing prophecy from Ali ibn Abi-Talib which predicts: Just before the coming of the Mahdi (who some believe to be the Antichrist), a “tall black man will assume the reins of government in the West.” This leader will command “the strongest army on earth” and will bear “a clear sign” from the third imam, Hussein. The prophecy concludes that : “Shiites should have no doubt that he is with us.” 

Is Obama the one referred to? A review of his name indicates that he is: Barack Hussein means the blessing of Hussein in Arabic and Persian; Obama in the Persian alphabet reads O Ba Ma, which means “he is with us.” This is the magic formula in Majlisi’s tradition. [1] 

Jesus warned of a sinister figure who would appear at some time in the future capable of turning men’s hearts away from Himself and towards him: I am come in my Father’s name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive (John 5:43). Scholars have for years seen this statement as a clear prophecy of the coming Antichrist. 

One thing we can be certain of regarding Antichrist is this: Neither he nor his supporters will allow for the idea that he’s the son of perdition we’ve looked for over 2000 years. Take as an example that Obama presented himself to Israel on the 10th day of Nisan-  the exact date of the Triumphal entry when the Lord Jesus Christ presented Himself on a donkey to Israel some 2000 years ago. 

But despite the outcry of his devotees against his real identity, one day he will appear, and when he comes it will be to a world in chaos, a Middle East on the verge of an explosion, economic catastrophes and amidst cries of peace.  Antichrist’s rise to the national political spotlight will be nothing short of meteoric. Heralded as a Saviour[2] of mankind, his devotees (Rev. 13:4,8,12; etc), will be drawn into his web of wickedness through good words and fair speeches (that) deceive the hearts of the simple (Rom. 16:18). Sadly, Jesus warned of such a time saying if it were possible they shall deceive the very elect (Matt. 24:24). I’m convinced that just as Hitler- a Roman Catholic- was endorsed by the pope and the church, there will be untold numbers of liberal theologians and church leaders exalting the virtues of the Antichrist as self acclaimed “holy men” sing his praises while at the same time attacking anyone daring to oppose him. [3] 

His range of authority will eventually span the globe, as people begin to recognize his “superhuman” skills and join his NEW WORLD ORDER! 

It is this author’s intention to open the Word of God and expose the satanically inspired Antichrist, along with his . In many ways cited in this book, we find the willingness to consider the advantages of a world leader. According to avid one-worlders, this  universal dictator with charismatic leadership ability may be a necessity in the course of world unification. Expect to see the rise of a new world religion that will serve as a catalyst for the spiritual togetherness of all nations. The main hopeful thrust for future world unity may be found in the current European attempt to achieve an intercontinental federation of nations. 

The Bible has a great deal to say about words and how they are used. It also has a great deal to say about deeds. Consider the following in light of the way President Obama and his fellow-liberals speak about Islam and how they speak about Christianity. As you read these, keep in mind that no one was dragged through the streets in protest. No one was killed:

“Either make the tree good and its fruit good, or make the tree bad and its fruit bad; for the tree is known by its fruit. You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks out of that which fills the heart. The good man brings out of his good treasure what is good; and the evil man brings out of his evil treasure what is evil. But I tell you that every careless word that people speak, they shall give an accounting for it in the day of judgment. For by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned” (Matt. 12:33–37). 

Obama’s Messiahship 

Barack Hussein Obama has been seen by many blasphemers as a deity worthy of worship. The thieving Jesse Jackson, Jr. said that Obama’s presence in the world would warrant more chapters being added to the Bible and Jamie Foxx and Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan took blasphemy a step further referring to him as mankind’s Saviour. Even the world at large has embraced him as a world changer. On October 9, 2009, barely nine months after his inauguration, the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Obama based solely upon what they hoped he would accomplish: “For his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples. The Committee has attached special importance to Obama’s vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons.”

Only a fool would say that Obama’s international diplomacy has worked. The siege of our Cairo embassy hoisted the flag of al Qaeda. Our Ambassador to Libya has been killed. Syria’s dictator kills his own people with abandon while Obama did little to stop it. Putin is gobbling up countries without opposition, and the Iranians have now developed nuclear arms targeting Israel and soon the US.

Obama the Unqualified and Illegal Candidate
Liberals wanting to debunk the illegal birth status do so at the peril of some very incriminating evidence; not the least of which is his grandmother’s testimony that he was born in Kenya, and the fact that when he attended Occidental College he applied for and received financial aid as a foreign student.  Now here’s the problem: either ole Bathhouse Barry boy is an illegal alien with no rights to the presidency, or else he owes tens of thousands of dollars to the Federal Government he defrauded by falsely applying for a foreign student grant of he wasn’t qualified for. Either way we can rest assured that the scurrilous deceiver in the oval office is without question playing an integral part of the end times deception we see unfolding all around us: “For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness” (2 Thessalonians 2:7-12). 

Obama’s Antichrist Characteristics (Dan. 7-12; 2 Thess. 2:3-12; Rev. 11-19)

Hitler was a type of the Antichrist. When he came to power, those who saw him for what he was- like Dietrich Bonhoeffer- were ridiculed, ignored, and ultimately imprisoned by the church and the fascist government they helped facilitate. Those of us who are trying to warn America about Obama are likewise met with disgust by leftists who call us unpatriotic racists in their nefarious efforts to silence our cries against his unconstitutional tyranny. 

What follows is an outline summary of a few characteristics suggesting that if Obama is not THE Antichrist, he is at least the closest type we’ve ever seen in the history of the world.
[i]The Antichrist will have a mouth speaking great things (Dan.7:8). Pres. Obama has been hailed as a great speaker. [as have many other world leaders, ie Hitler]

The Antichrist will rise to power as a little horn, wax exceedingly great, and take over the world (Dan.7:8; 8:9; Rev.13:7-8). Two years before he ran for President of the United States, Mr. Obama was virtually unknown (a little horn). Today, he has great power and some- including Henry Kissinger- want him to head up the New World Order and rule the world.

The Antichrist will seek to change laws (Dan.7:25). Pres. Obama has arbitrarily (some say illegally) changed laws. He ordered Holder to disregard the defense of marriage act; he has changed Obamacare more than 25 times; changed drug, immigration, and minimum wage laws without congressional approval, etc.

The Antichrist will wear out the saints (Dan.7:25). President Obama supported Mr. Morsi in Egypt and the rebels in Syria even though they were persecuting and killing Christians. He has tried to force Christians to pay for abortions, accept homosexuality, etc.

The Antichrist will magnify himself (Dan.8:11). President Obama was overheard telling French President Francois Hollande, “That’s the good thing about being president; I can do anything I want.” He thinks his words and actions are above question.

The Antichrist will cast down the truth (Dan.8:12). President Obama is a chronic liar whose promise: If you like your health care plan, you can keep it” was selected by PolitiFact as the 2013 “Lie of the Year.”

The Antichrist will destroy wonderfully (Dan.8:24). President Obama is destroying America’s military, healthcare system, Constitution, economy, etc. and he is not through.

The Antichrist will rise to power as a man of peace (Dan. 8:25). President Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize for doing nothing. He crafted a peace plan for the Middle East and said, “America will never give up.”

The Antichrist will break his covenant (Dan.9:27). President Obama has broken many agreements (Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Israel, etc.). At this point, he has not kept America’s treaty to protect Ukraine’s borders.

The Antichrist will do according to his will (Dan.11:36).  President Obama said, “We’re not just going to be waiting for legislation . . . . I’ve got a pen and I’ve got a phone.” He was saying he will do according to his will.

The Antichrist will not regard the god of his father (Dan.11:37). President Obama’s father is a Muslim whose god is Allah, and President Obama denies that his god is Allah.

The Antichrist will exalt himself (Dan.11:36-37; 2 Thess.2:4). Someone said, “Pres. Obama loves the man in the mirror.” He trashes everyone who disagrees with him; calls them extremists, domestic terrorists, racists, un-American, has the IRS investigate them, etc.

The Antichrist will divide the land of Israel for gain (Dan.11:39). Pres. Obama supports the two-state solution. He wants the Jews to stop construction on the West Bank, divide the land, and give the West Bank to the Palestinians.

The Antichrist will be given power (Rev. 13:2, 4-5). Pres. Obama rose from Community Organizer to Pres. of the United States without being vetted or doing anything to earn (or qualify him for) the position. His power was more or less given to him.

The Antichrist will track what people buy and sell (Rev.13:16-18). Pres. Obama has transformed the domestic spy program started by President Bush into a global spy program. Also, Obamacare requires all Americans to carry a National ID Card with personal identity descriptions (face scans, etc.) to track people by May 2017.

The Antichrist will be a false messiah that is worshipped by many (Rev.13:8). Many have called Pres. Obama the Messiah, the one, etc. Some have rewritten Christian songs to praise him. One photo of him has the Shekinah Glory around his face.

The Antichrist will establish a world government (Dan.7:23; Rev. 13:7; 17:12-13). Candidate Obama expressed support for a “globalized world.”

Obama’s Prophetic Rise

  1. His meteoric political rise to power. In less than 12 years he went from community organizer to US Senate to President. Daniel 8:9-12 And out of one of them came forth a little horn, which waxed exceeding great, toward the south, and toward the east, and toward the pleasant land.  (10)  And it waxed great, even to the host of heaven; and it cast down some of the host and of the stars to the ground, and stamped upon them.  (11)  Yea, he magnified himself even to the prince of the host, and by him the daily sacrifice was taken away, and the place of his sanctuary was cast down.  (12)  And an host was given him against the daily sacrifice by reason of transgression, and it cast down the truth to the ground; and it practised, and prospered. See Rev. 13.
  2. His initial unprecedented acceptance around the world: Dan. 7; Rev. 14
  3. His belligerence and arrogance: Daniel 7:11 I beheld then because of the voice of the great words which the horn spake: I beheld even till the beast was slain, and his body destroyed, and given to the burning flame.
  4. His strength and power: Daniel 8:24  And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power: and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people.
  5. His incessant blasphemies: Daniel 7:25 And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time. 2 Thessalonians 2:4  Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. Without question, Barack Hussein Obama is an arrogant blasphemer with a recorded history of speaking and acting negatively toward Christians and Christianity. Here are some examples:
  • The fact that he promotes Islam and the exaltation of its scandalous prophet Mohammad is in itself blasphemy
  • April 2008: Obama speaks disrespectfully of Christians, saying they “cling to guns or religion” and have an “antipathy to people who aren’t like them.”
  • April 2009: When speaking at Georgetown University, Obama orders that a monogram symbolizing Jesus’ name be covered when he is making his speech.
  • September 16, 2009: The Obama administration appoints as EEOC Commissioner Chai Feldblum, who asserts that society should “not tolerate” any “private beliefs,” including religious beliefs, if they may negatively affect homosexual “equality.”
  • May 2009: While Obama does not host any National Day of Prayer event at the White House, he does host White House Iftar dinners in honor of Ramadan.
  • 2010: While every White House traditionally issues hundreds of official proclamations and statements on numerous occasions, this White House avoids traditional Biblical holidays and events but regularly recognizes major Muslim holidays, as evidenced by its 2010 statements on Ramadan, Eid-ul-Fitr, Hajj, and Eid-ul-Adha.
  • October 19, 2010: Obama begins deliberately omitting the phrase about “the Creator” when quoting the Declaration of Independence: an omission he has made on no less than seven occasions.
  • April 2011: For the first time in American history, Obama urges passage of a non-discrimination law that does not contain hiring protections for religious groups, forcing religious organizations to hire according to federal mandates without regard to the dictates of their own faith, thus eliminating conscience protection in hiring.
  • August 2011: The Air Force stops teaching the Just War theory to officers in California because the course is taught by chaplains and is based on a philosophy introduced by St. Augustine in the third century AD: a theory long taught by civilized nations across the world.
  • May 2012 – The Obama administration opposes legislation to protect the rights of conscience for military chaplains who do not wish to perform same-sex marriages in violation of their strongly-held religious beliefs.
  • June 2012 – Bibles for the American military have been printed in every conflict since the American Revolution, but the Obama Administration revokes the long-standing U. S. policy of allowing military service emblems to be placed on those military Bibles.

February 2012: The Obama administration makes effulgent apologies for Korans being [accidentally] burned by the U. S. military, but when Bibles were burned by the military, numerous reasons were offered why it was the right thing to do. (The above examples were taken from Stephen McDowell, “Obama, Romney, Other: Who Should Christians Vote for in the 2012 Election?,” Providential Perspective, 26:2 September 2012).

  • September 2012: Obama apologized (for a straw man anti-Islamic movie) to Muslim Brotherhood thugs who on September 11, 2012 burned and looted several of our embassies, and tortured, sodomized, and then murdered our Ambassador  in Libya even though the Obama administration had received word these attacks had been planned months in advance.
  1. His fierce countenance: Daniel 8:23 And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a king of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences, shall stand up.
  2. His intrigue and deception: Daniel, Thessalonians, Revelation- 2 Thessalonians 2:10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
  3. His distinctions: Daniel 7:24 And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.
  4. His pro-Islamic, anti-Semitic, anti-Christian efforts: And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time (Daniel 7:25).
  5. His disregard for the rule of Law: He has written 139 executive orders since inauguration which is more than all previous presidents combined. And he shall . . . think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time (Daniel 7:25). 

Obama’s Mentors 

Muslim Socialist Father Barack Obama Sr. Evidence of Obama Junior’s Muslim heritage is the target of much scorn by hard left supporters who choose to consign it the legends of liars via “snopes” and other witting propagandists rather than admit the truth. Obama Jr. is committed Muslim and Brotherhood supporter. 

He inherited this from his father- Barack Hussein Obama- a Muslim name by the way- who was raised a Muslim, became an atheist, but later converted to Islam, and in college met a loosely “strange woman” (Jud. 11:2; Prov. 23:27) Stanley Ann Dunham who dropped out of college to give birth to her little Muslim offspring Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. In “Dreams From My Father”, Obama stated his life goal: “All of my life, I carried a single image of my father, one that I tried to take as my own. It was into my father’s image … that I’d packed all the attributes I sought in myself . . . the father of my dreams, the man in my mother’s stories, full of high-blown ideals.” 

Though Obama said little about what those “ideals” were, they crystallized in the form of a 1965 paper, written by the senior Obama and published in the East African Journal. In that paper, titled, “Problems Facing Our Socialism,” the elder Obama advocated the communal ownership of land and even the forced confiscation of privately controlled land. He also called for the nationalization of “European” and “Asian” owned enterprises, and advocated handing over control of these operations to the “indigenous” black population. Further, Obama’s father wanted to increase taxes on the rich, even up to the 100 percent level, arguing that “there is no limit on taxation if the benefits derived from public services by society measures up to the cost in taxation which they have to pay.” Incidentally, this concept is not totally foreign to the younger Obama, whose plan to “spread the wealth around” by raising taxes conceptually mimics his father’s plan.

Marxist Frank Marshall Davis: At the age of 16, Obama was abandoned when his mother left for Indonesia to seek a Ph.D. Wanting to give the boy a black role model, his maternal grandfather, a committed Marxist, introduced him to a Chicago bisexual Black Power dashiki clad dissident named Frank Marshall Davis who by this time was a well-known member of the Communist Party USA and an apologist for the Soviet Union listed with the House Un-American Activities Committee for his involvement with several communist-front organizations. Passages from “Dreams From My Father” suggest that Frank Marshall Davis was something akin to a surrogate dad to Obama in those days. Some believe he was intimately more. Obama’s initial and only contact when he moved to Chicago was Davis and of course his scurrilous band of anti-Americans.

Alice Palmer: Obama’s predecessor in the Illinois State Senate, Alice Palmer introduced Obama to Chicago’s radical elite in the living room of Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn’s home back in 1995 and endorsed him that year in front of a crowd of 200 supporters. Palmer was an active radical leftist in the decade before she picked Obama for her seat. The FBI notes that she served on the board of the U.S. Peace Council, a front organization and affiliate of the Soviet World Peace Council. Palmer attended the 27th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and came away favorably impressed by the Soviet system.

Gregory Galluzzo: A former Jesuit priest and executive director of the Gamaliel Foundation, Galluzzo was interview by New Republic’s Ryan Lizza and showed him the training manual he uses with new organizers. Galluzzo told Lizza that many new trainees have an aversion to Saul Alinsky’s gritty approach because they come to organizing as idealists rather than realists. Galluzzo, along with fellow trainer Mike Kruglik, schooled Obama in Alinsky tactics. The Developing Communities Project, Obama’s first employer in Chicago, was part of the Gamaliel network of organizations.

Mike Kruglik: Kruglik was a regional director for the Gamaliel Foundation. Like his boss, Greg Galluzzo, Kruglik also helped train Obama on Alinsky organizing methods. Kruglik was also involved in 2007 with indoctrinating Obama campaign volunteers on Alinsky methods.

Rev. Jeremiah Wright: Rev. Wright, also a bisexual and possible sexual partner to Obama- operated a club for homosexual black men in Chicago out of his Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ called the “down low club” of which Obama was a member. Part of the “program” offered by Wright was the orchestration of appearances whereby these sodomites could be disguised as being straight in an effort to keep their homosexual status under wraps. Michelle, who hung out at Jesse Jackson’s home, was brought in to satisfy those requirements for Obama. Later, Wright officiated their wedding, baptized their children and while continuing to provide cover for Obama’s sodomy. In press interviews, Obama regularly touted his 20-year membership in Trinity Church as proof of his devotion to Christianity – until remarks by Rev. Wright became an embarrassment to his campaign. A closer look at Obama’s pastor and longtime church reveals that Trinity practices – and preaches – communism via Black Liberation Theology, and Wright sees “his own form of Christianity as profoundly different from Christianity as typically practiced by most American whites and blacks.” During one of his more memorable anti-American screeds, Rev. Wright said, “The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing ‘God Bless America.’ No, no, no, God d*** America, that’s in the Bible for killing innocent people.”

Trinity church gave between $5,000 and $10,000 to the Community Renewal Society, which was a pet project of Bill Ayers’ father, Tom Ayers.

John L. McKnight: John McKnight is a professor at Northwestern University and sits on the board of the Gamaliel Foundation. McKnight is yet another of the Gamaliel trainers who schooled Obama in Alinsky tactics and methods. In his memoir, Obama said he wanted to go to Harvard Law School with the goal of making large-scale change as a national politician, and McKnight was the individual who wrote him a letter of recommendation. Obama said that being tutored by McKnight, Galluzzo and Kruglik was “the best education I ever had, better than anything I got at Harvard Law School.” (emphasis added) (O’Leary)

Obama’s Hard Left History 

That Obama is a product of the radical leftist Chicago machine is nothing new. During his 2004 Senate campaign his Marxist proclivities became well known during the campaign by his opponents as well as his socialist activist network which includes former members of the Students for a Democratic Society, from which the Weather Underground was born, Communist Party USA and the Democratic Socialists of America. This axis wants Obama to hold the reins of power in the White House. They have a socialist agenda for America – one that isn’t far from Obama’s own agenda. In fact, Obama has yet to point out how his agenda differs from theirs. (O’Leary) 

This is an article written by an ex IRS investigator….very interesting. Trump is correct, (Bathhouse) (Bathhouse) Barry Soetoro, AKA Obama is hiding something in his past that is very bad… and it may not be his citizenship. (Trump would not say this if he did not know something and he has the money to get the dirt…)

As an IRS tax examiner,one of many former federal jobs, I have seen what it appears (Bathhouse) Barry Soetoro has done, mostly by illegal aliens attempting to acquire a new identity in the U.S and/or criminals looking to acquire a new ID. 

Barry, AKA Obama, was lawfully adopted by a foreign national, Lolo Soetoro, and Barry’s name was legally changed to “Barry Soetoro”. (Barry’s own admission) (Bathhouse) Barry Soetoro was also made an official legal Indonesian citizen. (again Barry’s own admission)  The adoption would be noted in Barry’s vital statistics record in Hawaii on his original birth certificate…

OR Lolo Soetoro may have always been Barry’s legal birth farther. The public does not know for sure at this point who Bathhouse Barry’s father really was and Barry himself may not know.

Barry was raised as a Muslim in Indonesia and attended a Catholic funded school that permitted all faiths to attend.

Barry’s mother dropped him as a dependent for some reason, maybe even when Bathhouse Barry was adopted by Lolo Soetoro.  His mother’s passport records dropped Barry as a dependent indicating Barry was no longer a legal dependent of his mothers. (The passport records of his mother have been produced showing Barry was no longer a dependent when Barry was permanently residing in Indonesia.) Barry went to Hawaii to live with his alleged grand parents after Lolo Soetoro and Barry’s mother divorced.

A “certificate of live birth” can have names changed on it including a child’s birth name, and birth parent’s names. Even a modified date of birth can be on a “certificate of live birth”.  This occurs frequently for adopted children where the birth parent does not want the child to know who they are. The public has no idea who Barry’s real birth father is or who Barry’s real birth mother is. (Bathhouse Barry could have been adopted by his mother) The original birth certificate is the only legal vital statistics record of a person’s birth parents, birth location, birth date, etc… I can get a “certificate of live birth” for a dead person; I cannot get a birth certificate of a dead person without “Deceased” on it. (I’ve tried)

There is no evidence (Bathhouse) Barry Soetoro ever lawfully changed his name to “Barrack Hussein Obama”. There is no proof (Bathhouse) Barry Soetoro was born with the name “Barrack Hussein Obama”. I’m willing to bet the name “Barrack Hussein Obama” is not present on the real birth certificate as Barry’s birth name or as Barry’s birth father. I have pictures of me with my mother and Jimmy Buffet… that doesn’t make him my father even if I start using the name Jimmy Buffet.

The public knows (Bathhouse) Barry Soetoro finished high school in Hawaii as (Bathhouse) Barry Soetoro and attended Occidental as (Bathhouse) Barry Soetoro where he did drugs and flunked out of school. After dropping out of Occidental, Barry showed up in New York, homeless and on drugs. (Barry’s own admission) Barry then hooked up with a Pakistani to live with and traveled back to Indonesia on his new boyfriend’s dime to renew his Indonesian passport and traveled to Pakistan with him.

Ask any law enforcement officer in a large city or detective and they will tell you homeless young men on drugs in large cities usually end up as male prostitutes.  Barry ended up as a world traveler with a degree… (Not likely)

(Bathhouse) Barry Soetoro returned to New York from Pakistan and began using the fictitious name “Obama” for some reason. (again (Bathhouse) Barry Soetoro’s own admission) One could only suspect that a person addicted to drugs returning from Pakistan to New York, the main route for Afghan heroin into the U.S., maybe Barry had a reason to start using a new name. There are literally over 1 million open warrants on file in New York… maybe Barry is one of them?….

After spending some time in New York allegedly working under the name “Obama”, It appears Barry used the fictitious name “Barrack Hussein Obama” for the first time to file his federal taxes in Connecticut at a Post Office Box for the purpose of evading paying taxes in New York and /or to establish a new identity. (This is a felony with no statute of limitation.)

When the IRS received (Bathhouse) Barry Soetoro’s federal tax filing, the IRS could not attach the name Barrack Hussein Obama to the SSI number provided or the address provided. So the IRS assigned the fictitious name “Barrack Hussein Obama” a tax ID number for a person from Connecticut (Where Barry unlawfully filed a federal tax form using a false name). (Bathhouse) Barry Soetoro began using the tax ID number as his SSI number when using the fictitious name Barrack Obama. This is why (Bathhouse) Barry Soetoro has a Connecticut SSI number. When I worked for the IRS, I saw this occur more than once and yes, it is a felony to knowingly file a fraudulent federal tax forms. Most of the politicians that cheat on their taxes claim it was an accident. That is how they get away with their tax cheat crimes. Using a fake name is no accident.

It appears Barry fled New York to Chicago using his new identity to get a job . He likely ordered a fake diploma to bolster his new identity as “Obama”. Fake Diploma’s were very big in the 80’s and diploma mills were even being used by federal workers to get promotions. There is evidence his alleged attendance at Columbia was faked (Barry never attended Columbia) and Barry lied his way into Harvard (he had no transcripts to get in)… Including telling the Saudi royal family he was fighting in Afghanistan with the Muslim Jihad against the Russians, so they would help him get into a law school.

The Saudi’s apparently loved Barry’s story of Jihad in Pakistan/Afghanistan and paid for Barry to attend Harvard under the name “Obama”. The Saudi family has admitted to paying for Obama to attend Harvard and gave Harvard a gift of $20 million dollars. Harvard in turn made their special attendy President of the law review a person that never wrote a single law review…. I guess that is what $20 million buys at Harvard.

It is unlikely Bathhouse Barry was a Jihadist and was most likely a drug mule if anything, maybe even a CIA street hire to haul Afghan heroin back to New York, so the Afghans could buy U.S. made stinger missiles with U.S. dollars to shoot down Russian helicopters?… I hired people over seas to do work below my pay grade all the time, even foreign nationals… I think this is the story Barry told the Saudi’s, but he was most likely really just a drug mule/dealer and probably still wanted on an outstanding warrant in New York. 

Bathhouse Barry’s selective service registration is not normal either. After I looked at Barry’s selective service filing I noticed it was most likely fraudulent too based on the name he used. Barry did not start using the name “Obama” until he returned from Pakistan (long after he flunked out of school in California) His selective service record (maintained in Chicago coincidentally) shows he registered at a Hawaiian post office as “Obama” in Sept 1980… Problem, Barry was getting high in California at Occidental in Sept 1980 (Barry’s own admission) and was not using the fictitious name “Obama” at that time. Barry began using the fictitious name “Obama” only after he returned from Pakistan. The selective service filing is fraudulent.

NEW NOTE – On the Selective Service Registration, Barry did not have the Connecticut Tax ID number he used on the Registration until after he began using the name “Obama” in New York. More evidence his Selective Service filing is fraudulent.

Barry returned to Chicago and attend a semi-christian radical black church with his first female love Michelle. Barry admits keeping in touch with Phil Boener, who traveled to New York from Occidental to be with Barry and was most likely Barry’s first love.

Barry still could not get a real job, because he was still a fraud, even with his Harvard degree in hand he could lie and take the Bar exam, but he could not work as a lawyer for a major law firm without a back ground investigation and he would never pass one. So, Michelle got Barry a job at her law firm. Barry never filed a case alone and never filed a motion. He wrote lost of memos according to the law firm where Barry worked. (I think they know Barry is a fraud and don’t want to be sued by previous clients) Barry rescinded his law licenses, so as not to be disbarred for fraud. The Bar knows Barry lied on his application. Michelle also had to turn over her law license for her involvement in corruption with the Chicago mayors office.

With time on his hands Barry, a well spoken black man, was able to get elected to a state office, oddly because he looked for fraud in his opponents voter registrations and got his opponent disqualified from running. Barry a well versed liar was a natural in state politics. He used his political influence to get himself a position as a lecturer at Chicago’s law school. Barry embellished this position as a “professor of law” which everyone knows is completely false. Barry was not a professor or even a specialist at anything but lying.

On a whim Bathhouse Barry ran for United States Senate for the State of Illinois. Politicians do this all the time to make a name for themselves even if they can’t win. At the time the Republican Ryan was a shoe in for the Senate seat, so no real Democrat contenders entered the race, but Barry did. On a fluke after the primary Ryan’s wife Jeri Ryan (Seven of nine from Star Trek) went public that her husband was making her have sex with other people while he watched. Ryan dropped out and Alan Keys moved from Maryland to run against (Bathhouse) Barry Soetoro.

The election got all kinds of press because there was no blacks in the U.S. Senate and one of these black men was going to be a Senator. Alan Keys did his best to warn everyone Barry was not who he claimed to be, but the public saw him as a carpet bagger. Barry kept the lie going and presented himself as a clean black man that talked like a white man… Illinois elected Barry to U.S. Senate. The Democrats had already began scrubbing Barry’s back ground when Ryan dropped out.

Phil, Barry’s boy friend from Occidental, was found working in California as a communications specialist (receptionist) for a dental hygienist school and given a diploma from Columbia and cover story. The rest of Barry’s drug friends were all given jobs or money by the Democrat machine to keep quiet.

Because Barry was such a news maker as the only Black in the Senate, and he could speak like a white man he was made key speaker for the Democrat convention. Barry then decided to run for President to keep the lie going. No one thought to question Barry’s back ground in the Democrt party… They helped cover up the ugly back ground. The only person jumping up and down warning Barry was not who he claimed to be was Alan Keys and he was discarded as just an angry loser.

Now we have a complete fraud sitting in the Office of the President. Clearly the most corrupt, inexperienced, and ignorant President in the history of the United States who’s only quality is that he can lie with a straight face.

(Bathhouse) Barry Soetoro is as much of a fraud as Bernie Madoff and one day his house of cards will all topple to the floor.

Obama the Muslim 

Barry changed his name to Barack Hussein Obama II in the Muslim tradition after his conversion to it. The question regarding why First Lady Michelle Obama never accompanies the president on trips to Muslim countries is not hard to explain when you understand Sharia law. Dr. Jim Murk, a Middle Eastern Scholar and expert on Islam writes this: “An orthodox Muslim man would never take his wife on a politically oriented trip to any nation which practices Sharia law, particularly Saudi Arabia [4] where the Wahhabi sect is dominant. This is true and it is why Obama left Michelle in Europe. She will stay home when he visits Arab countries. He knows Muslim protocol; this includes, bowing to the Saudi King. Obama is regarded as a Muslim in the Arab world, because he was born to a Muslim father; he acknowledged his Muslim faith with George Stephanopoulus who quickly corrected him. 

Mr. Obama defines himself as a Christian, but the evidence isn’t there. He claims to have been converted by the dubious Rev. Jeremiah Wright, a racist liberal Chicago heretic who bears the same kind of nefarious fruit from his Liberation Theology [5] as do the Rev’s Jackson and Sharpton. Obama- under Wright’s 20 year tutelage-  denies the main pre-requisite to salvation, that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and God the Son; scoffs at the Bible and uses it only in a twisted fashion. 

He downplays his involvement with Christianity, by not publicly joining a Christian church in D.C. And occasionally attending the chapel for services at Camp David. He also played down the fact that America is a Christian country and said, unbelievably, that it was one of the largest Muslim nations in the world, which is nonsense. He has publicly taken the side of the Palestinians in the conflict with Israel and he ignored the National Day of Prayer, something no other President has ever done. He is bad news! He conceals his true faith to the detriment of the American people.” 

Federal Court vs. Civilian Court

Another interesting item involves Sharia Law and the reason Barack Hussein Obama insisted that the U.S. Attorney General hold the trials of the 911 Muslim Terrorists in Civilian Courts as mere common criminals instead of as vile terrorists who attacked the United States of America. 

If the Muslim Terrorists are tried in Military Tribunals, convicted and sentenced to death, by LAW, the President of the United States, would be required to sign their death warrants. However, Obama would not be required to sign the death warrants if they are sentenced to death by a civilian court. Recently, Muslim Jihadist, Army Major Hassan slaughtered non-Muslim soldiers at Ft. Hood, Texas rather than go to Afghanistan and be a part of anything that could lead to the deaths of fellow Muslims. He stated that Muslims could not- and should not- kill fellow Muslims. Is the motive for Barack Hussein Obama’s insistence on civilian trials, to make sure he doesn’t have to sign the death warrants for the Muslim terrorists? Why would he, as President of the United States, not sign the death warrants for Muslim Terrorists who attacked the United States and murdered over 3,000 U.S. Citizens on 9/11? 

Could it be that he is forbidden by his Muslim faith to authorize the execution of Muslims? 

Obama Admits to Being a Muslim

Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit said he had a one-on-one meeting with Obama, in which President Obama told him that he was still a Muslim, the son of a Muslim father, the stepson of Muslim stepfather, that his half brothers in Kenya are Muslims, and that he was sympathetic towards the Muslim agenda. 

“Finally, during the week of 14-18th of January 2010, just on the eve of my winter tour to the US, Rachel picked up a Nile TV broadcast in which Egyptian Foreign Minister Abul Gheit said on the “Round Table Show” that he had had a one on one meeting with Obama who swore to him that he was a Moslem, the son of a Moslem father and step-son of Moslem step-father, that his half-brothers in Kenya were Moslems, and that he was loyal to the Moslem agenda. He asked that the Moslem world show patience. Obama promised that once he overcame some domestic American problems (Healthcare), that he would show the Moslem world what he would do with Israel.”Pam Geller – http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/egyptian-foreign-minister-obama-told-me-himself-i-am-a-muslim/ 

Muslim Agenda and President Obama

Avi Lipkin 

What is the difference between neurotic and psychotic people? Neurotic people dream about castles in the air, psychotic people live in the castles in the air. And psychiatrists collect the rent. 

The clear agenda of the Obama administration to isolate Israel in deference to Arab demands reminded me of a testimony I heard in a church in Washington State in 1998. A Christian sailor, today the pastor of that church, saved his ship in an act of great heroism. In return for this, he was recommended for promotion to an officer’s course. But first, he had to pass a “loyalty” test. The question was: “What would you do if you were captain of this ship and ordered by Washington DC to launch a nuclear strike on Tel Aviv?” The sailor shrugged and laughed.”Why are you laughing?” asked the captain. His answer was: “First, I am a Christian. God promised that Israel would never be destroyed. Second, I wouldn’t want to be on that ship because God would destroy that ship and all on board.” The captain asked the sailor what he was doing in the US Navy. How could a man holding these Christian beliefs follow orders from Washington? 

We are not talking about the Russian, Turkish or Arab navies, but rather the navy of the so-called greatest Christian nation on earth, the United States of America. Indeed, Presidents Jimmy Carter, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush were also subservient to the Arab agenda, under the guise of the “land for peace formula.” Even George W. Bush, who is widely regarded as one of the best friends Israel ever had in the White House, coined the phrase: “A Palestinian state in 2008.” 

But worse than a so-called “Christian” president doing the bidding of the Arab/Islamic agenda, is a Muslim president flying under the radar with no one politically incorrect enough to stand up and say: “The emperor has no clothes!” Today, the United States has a president by the name of Mubarack Hussein Obama. Until proven otherwise I believe he is a Muslim. 

My wife Rachel, who monitors Arab language broadcasts for Israel Radio, picked up a revealing statement on the “Round Table Show” on Egypt’s Nile TV. Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Abul Gheit said he had a one-on-one meeting with Obama, who told him that he was a Muslim, the son of a Muslim father and stepson of Muslim stepfather, that his half-brothers in Kenya were Muslims, and that he was sympathetic to the Muslim agenda. He asked the Arabs to show patience. Obama promised that once he overcame some domestic American issues (like healthcare reform), he would show the Muslim world how he would deal with Israel. Pro-Arab, so-called Christian presidents are one thing. 

But how concerned should we be if the US President is a Muslim who is loyal to the Muslim agenda to isolate and weaken Israel? When the Palestinians talk about nothing but war with Israel and its annihilation, and the president of what was our strongest ally backs their demands for a state with Jerusalem as its capital, and adheres to the same faith, should we not be warning the American public? 

I can understand why Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is so adamant not to offend Obama. But I think it would behoove us to work with the US Congress, three-quarters of which recently sent the Obama administration a letter demanding that it stop harassing Israel. Congress still stands with Israel. In addition, Obama is losing support among American Jews. While 78 percent of US Jews voted for him in the 2008 elections, a new poll shows that today, 48 percent are unhappy with his performance and only 42 percent still support him. Polls also show that more than 60 percent of American Christians support Israel. It is time to create an awakening among our true brethren and allies in America: Congress, the Jews and the Christians. We must work together to thwart the emerging alliance between the US and the Arab-Islamic agenda. We must pray for an awakening among the Jews and a Christian revival for Israel’s survival. 

References and Acknowledgements

[1] Thomas Horn and Chris Putnam, Petrus Romanus, Defender Publications (2012), p 409

[2] If this sounds eerily reminiscent of the 2008 US presidential election, you have a capsulated concept of just how powerful this force really is.

[3] We saw this viciousness in 2010 aimed at the Tea Party movement, a grassroots group of patriots united together to call America back to our Christian roots and the government back to being “of the people, by the people, and for the people.”

[4] When Obama bowed before the King, he was signaling his Muslim faith to the Islamic world.

[5] Liberation theology is a political movement in Christian theology which interprets the teachings of Jesus Christ in terms of a liberation from unjust economic, political, or social conditions. It has been described by proponents as “an interpretation of Christian faith through the poor’s suffering, their struggle and hope, and a critique of society and the Catholic faith and Christianity through the eyes of the poor”, and by detractors as Christianized Marxism. (Wikipedia)

[i] Daymond Duck 

O’Leary, Brad. “The Audacity of Deceit- Obama’s Mentors.” WorldNetDaily (10/17/08). Online Magazine.


%d bloggers like this: